To: SunkenCiv
The 16th century is now considered “ancient”?
7 posted on
06/02/2012 8:37:20 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
To: ClearCase_guy; SunkenCiv
The 16th century is now considered “ancient”?It is relativistic.
A century ago you could get a whore for two bits.
Now it is bag a bag for a dime bag.
Now for some economic theory...
8 posted on
06/02/2012 8:51:04 PM PDT by
bigheadfred
(MY PET TAPEWORM OBIWAN IS AN INSANE MILITARY HATING LEFTIST)
To: ClearCase_guy; bigheadfred
That choice of adjective seems to happen a lot with archaeology/history articles from the Far East.
WWII has been over for nearly 67 years, but the daunting number for me is, the final US pullout from Vietnam was 37 years ago, seven years more than the interval from the end of WWII to the end of Vietnam.
11 posted on
06/02/2012 9:21:20 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson