Posted on 05/22/2012 7:14:11 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
For the second year in a row, 24/7 Wall St. examined the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments report on life satisfaction in the developed world. Economic prosperity, health and a strong social support network continue to correspond highly with happiness. Once again, the United States fails to make the top 10 happiest nations in the world, while countries like Australia, Israel and all of the Scandinavian nations do.
The OECD measured more than 30 sets of data in 11 different categories, including education, health and employment. The study also asked residents of each country to rank, on a scale of 1 to 10, their general satisfaction with their lives. 24/7 Wall St. examined the 10 countries with the highest life satisfaction scores to find the strongest factors related to happiness.
Economic prosperity appears to be one of the strongest factors that relates to overall life satisfaction. Of the 10 countries with the highest levels of happiness, nine have personal incomes that are higher than the OECD average. Eight of them have among the highest disposable incomes among developed nations.
In addition, the overall regional economies of these 10 nations appear to be doing exceptionally well. Government debt as a percentage of gross domestic product in these countries is either among the smallest in the developed world, or these nations are actually running a surplus. Norway, which has the second-highest satisfaction score, has a government surplus of 162.5% of its GDP.
Employment is one of the most obvious causes of satisfaction, according to Matthias Rumpf, OECDs chief media officer, especially long-term employment and job stability. Of the 10 countries with the highest job satisfaction rates, nine are among the 15 with the lowest long-term unemployment rates the percentage of the population that has been unemployed for more than a year. Those who are unemployed are generally not very happy, Rumpf says. And long-term unemployment is even worse, he explains. While being between jobs can affect a person, the longer you are unemployed, the worse it gets.
After economic stability, physical and social well-being are the largest determinants for happiness. When it comes to self-reported health, eight of the 10 countries have a higher rate of citizens reporting good health than the OECD average of 70%. All but one have a higher life expectancy than the OECD average of 79.8 years. When it comes to having a strong social support network, seven of the countries have among the largest percentage of residents reporting having a friend or relative they could rely on in a case of need.
Not surprisingly, having enough leisure time affects a persons mental health and strongly impacts happiness. According to the report, while data is incomplete, the majority of the countries with a strong sense of well-being have more leisure time each day than the OECD average of 14.76 hours (this includes sleep). The citizens of Denmark, the happiest country, have the most leisure time available per day, at 16.06 hours.
The U.S. ranks 11th in life satisfaction, just missing the top 10. This suggests that while some of these categories may impact happiness, they do not guarantee it. Despite its above-average score, the U.S. has the highest rate of disposable income in the OECD and an extremely high rate of self-reported good health. Meanwhile, the U.S. has a particularly low life expectancy for developed nations, which at 78.7 years is worse than 26 other developed nations. The U.S. also has a low job security rate and a relatively high long-term unemployment rate.
Examining 34 separate member nations, a number of emerging economies, and two additional participating countries Brazil and Russia the OECDs 2012 Better Life Index report measured more than 30 indices in 11 separate categories: housing, income, jobs, community, education, the environment, civic engagement, health, life satisfaction, safety and work-life balance. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 countries in which residents reported personal well-being at an average of 7.2 out of 10 or better.
These are the happiest countries in the world.
10. Sweden
> Life satisfaction score: 7.3 (5th)
> Employment rate: 73% (5th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 79% (9th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 1.28% (3rd lowest)
> Disposable income: $26,633 (11th highest)
> Educational attainment: 86% (9th highest)
> Life expectancy: 81.5 years (7th highest)
In the OECDs latest Better Life Index report, Sweden scores 7.3, the 10th-best score. Sweden has a life expectancy of 81.5 years, which is the seventh highest in the OECD. The country has extremely low pollution levels as well. According to the Better Life Index data, 97% of Swedes are satisfied with the quality of their drinking water the second most among developed countries. The country also has the lowest levels of air pollution in the OECD. In the country, leisure is a priority for the working population as just 1.28% of Swedish employees work in excess of 50 hours per week. By comparison, 10.86% of U.S. employees work that much each week.
9. Canada
> Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 4th)
> Employment rate: 72% (7th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 88% (3rd highest)
> Employees working long hours: 3.91% (11th highest)
> Disposable income: $27,138 (8th highest)
> Educational attainment: 88% (5th highest)
> Life expectancy: 80.8 years (13th highest)
Canadas score of 7.4 has much to do with the success of its health care system, a socialized plan that provides coverage to all of its citizens. As many as 88% of Canadians report their health to be good or very good, which ranks third among all nations surveyed. Canada also ranks among the top 15 nations in life expectancy. Other factors that may be contributing to Canadians high life satisfaction level are education and employment levels. Some 88% of Canadians have at least a high school diploma the fifth-highest rate among the nations the OECD reviewed. Also, 72% of working-age citizens are employed the seventh-highest rate. By comparison, Italy one of the poorer-performing countries in these categories has a working-age employment rate of 57%, and only 54% of its population has at least a high school diploma.
8. Australia
> Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 4th)
> Employment rate: 72% (9th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 85% (5th highest)
> Employees working long hours:13.99% (4th highest)
> Disposable income: $26,927 (9th highest)
> Educational attainment: 71% (12th lowest)
> Life expectancy: 81.8 years (5th highest)
Of the countries with high life satisfaction, Australias citizens have comparatively little leisure time. They tend to work long hours, with nearly 14% of the population working 50 hours a week or more. Australians are healthier than most, with a life expectancy of 81.8 years the fifth highest in the OECD. Additionally, 85% of Australians report their health to be either good or very good. The national economy has also fared well in recent years, with a post-financial crisis peak unemployment rate of only 5.7%. Presently, the Australian unemployment rate is 4.9%. Another sign of economic strength is the low government debt that stands only at 4.9% of GDP. Comparatively, the U.S. government debt represents 73.8% of GDP.
7. Finland
> Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 4th)
> Employment rate: 68% (14th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 68% (15th lowest)
> Employees working long hours: 3.66% (8th highest)
> Disposable income: $24,958 (14th highest)
> Educational attainment: 82% (14th highest)
> Life expectancy: 80.2 years (16th lowest)
According to OECD figures, the Finns value their free time. They devote 14.9 hours per day to leisure on average, the ninth highest among developed nations. Americans, on the other hand, rank 20th with only 14.27 hours of leisure time each day. Finland also has the eighth-lowest percentage of employees working more than 50 hours per week, at only 3.66%. When they are not working, many Finns like to indulge by taking a sauna so many, in fact, that a country with a population of 5.3 million has 2 million saunas, much more than the number of cars in the country.
6. Israel
> Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 4th)
> Employment rate: 60% (11th lowest)
> Self-reported good health: 81% (7th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 18.92% (3rd highest)
> Disposable income: n/a
> Educational attainment: 82% (12th highest)
> Life expectancy: 81.7 years (6th highest)
Israelis have a life expectancy of 81.7 years sixth highest among OECD nations. The country also has a low obesity rate of 13.8%, while 81% of those surveyed report their health to be good or very good. By comparison, Americans life expectancy is 78.7 years, and they also have a higher obesity rate of 33.8% among adults. Despite the constant security concerns in the country, the homicide rate in Israel is in line with the OECDs average of 2.1 murders per 100,000 people. In addition, 70% of Israelis surveyed feel safe walking home at night. Although Israelis work long hours, with 18.92% working at least 50 hours a week, life satisfaction remains high.
5. Austria
> Life satisfaction score: 7.5 (tied for 3rd)
> Employment rate: 72% (8th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 69% (17th lowest)
> Employees working long hours: 9.02% (10th highest)
> Disposable income: $27,541 (7th highest)
> Educational attainment: 82% (13th highest)
> Life expectancy: 80.7 (22nd lowest)
Austria stands out in many economic categories. Ranking within the top 10 in both employment rate and disposable income, the Austrians have certainly had some measure of financial success. Disposable income, in particular, stands out as a strong factor in happiness for Austrians. The countrys average annual disposable income is $27,541, while OECD nations average $22,387. This disparity may be in part attributable to the number of citizens working in excess of 50 hours a week, which, at 9.02%, ranks 10th among OECD nations.
4. Switzerland
> Life satisfaction score: 7.5 (tied for 3rd)
> Employment rate: 79% (1st highest)
> Self-reported good health: 87% (4th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 5.87% (17th highest)
> Disposable income: $27,756 (5th most)
> Educational attainment: 87% (8th highest)
> Life expectancy: 82.6 (2nd highest)
The most salient statistic with respect to well-being for the fourth ranked country on the list is employment. Switzerland tops the list in terms of working age employment rate at a whopping 79%. Switzerland also cracks the top five in three other categories: disposable income ($27,756), self-reported good health (87%) and life expectancy (82.6 years). Given these stellar numbers, it is easy to see why, according to the U.S. Department of State, Switzerland consistently ranks high on quality of life indices. The Swiss also have very high rates of insurance coverage and computer and Internet usage.
3. Netherlands
> Life satisfaction score: 7.5 (tied for 3rd)
> Employment rate: 75% (3rd highest)
> Self-reported good health: 77% (11th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 0.68% (2nd highest)
> Disposable income: $25,740 (13th highest)
> Educational attainment: 73% (15th lowest)
> Life expectancy: 80.8 (14th highest)
The Dutch government is heavily involved in internal economic affairs, playing a significant role pertaining to almost every aspect of economic activity, according to the U.S. Department of State. Judging by Netherlands 75% employment rate the third highest among those surveyed this regulated, monitored economy has thrived in recent years. Of those employed, only 0.68% work longer than 50 hours a week the second-lowest percentage among those surveyed. By contrast, 10.86% of U.S. workers eclipse the 50 hour mark. The Dutch also rank among the top 15 in self-reported good health, life expectancy and disposable income.
2. Norway
> Life satisfaction score: 7.6 (2nd)
> Employment rate: 75% (4th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 80% (8th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 2.66% (5th highest)
> Disposable income: $30,465 (5th highest)
> Educational attainment: 81% (15th highest)
> Life expectancy:81.2 (10th highest)
Of all the nations examined in the OECDs report, Norway is among the most financially secure. Of working-age adults, 75% are employed the fourth-best rate. Also, the average household disposable income is $30,645, the third highest among OECD nations. Norway also significantly outspends almost all other surveyed nations on health care, allocating $5,003 per person per year. This is well above the average for OECD nations of $3,060 per person per year. Norway also has one of the healthiest populations, with a life expectancy of 81.2 years and 80% claiming to be in good or very good health. Showcasing its economic strength, Norway is able to provide quality public health and education services while maintaining a budget surplus of 162.5% of GDP and an AAA rating from Standard & Poors Rating Services.
1. Denmark
> Life satisfaction score: 7.8 (1st)
> Employment rate: 73% (6th highest)
> Self-reported good health: 71% (17th highest)
> Employees working long hours: 1.92% (4th highest)
> Disposable income: $23,213 (15th lowest)
> Educational attainment: 76% (18th lowest)
> Life expectancy: 79.3 (11th lowest)
Denmark tops the OECD ranking as the country with the most satisfied citizens among the countries studied by the OECD. At first glance, the reason is not obvious. Denmark ranks no higher than fourth in any of the categories that appear to correlate strongly with overall satisfaction. Yet, in addition to the OECD, organizations such as the World Map of Happiness and the World Database of Happiness have consistently put Denmark at the top of their list of the worlds happiest countries. A high employment rate of 73% and a low percentage of 1.92% of employees working long hours contribute to high satisfaction levels. But overall, it is hard to pin down why those Danes are so darn happy.
Many of these countries are just plain eaten up by Muslims. I find the results difficult to believe.
Of these, I’d pick Australia to retire to.
Canada is just too COLD and the rest are just too liberal.
Compare similar cultural groups (American’s with Swedish, Norwegian, or Swiss roots, and I bet you will find the index to be comparable.
I notice nothing on the survey to compare freedom of action, to keep what you earn and dispose of it how you wish.
These surveys are designed to make particular political points.
It seems odd to me that of these 10 “happiest” countries, only two (Israel and The Netherlands) have suicide rates that are lower than the US. (See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate)
The definition of “happy” varies widely. Which nation is “happiest” is more a matter of what percentage of residents achieve _their_ definition of happy, not whether demographic statistics adhere to a Western Leftist’s definition thereof.
Oh please. We have higher disposable income than any of these nations and hence we have more purchasing power than any of these nations and in fact many cases we have much higher purchasing power than countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria, and Israel.
Israel is seriously on this list? They are constantly under the threat of terrorist attacks. So much death of innocents because of the radical Muslim animals, and they make the list of happiest countries? Something is wrong with this list.
It’s interesting to note that these ‘happiest’ countries also happen to be the coutries which burden their people with the highest levels of tax, Denmark having the highest levels of income tax in the world.
I suspect it’s socialist sheep mentality - they think they are happy because their government keeps most of their money and decides how to spend it for them, relieving them of the burden of personal responsibility. Likewise the countries with the highest levels of disposable income such as the US and UK always come lower down on these surveys, but I know where I’d rather be.
Life is hard...harder when you’re stupid.
Too many stupid people in america...they are dragging down our average.
RE: Id pick Australia to retire to. Canada is just too COLD and the rest are just too liberal.
You must be really wealthy ....
1) Australia now has one of the most expensive real estate in the world ( due to her strong currency which has APPRECIATED tremendously vs the USD ).
2) John Howard ( a conservative ), was Prime Minister for close to 10 years and made Australia very competitive ( with low debt and excellent fiscal policies ). Then, the Labor Party took over ( via a slim margin ).
Who knows what will happen next? The current PM, a woman ( Julia Gillard ) is an atheist, a pro-choicer, and isn’t even married to the man she is living with.
RE: Israel is seriously on this list? They are constantly under the threat of terrorist attacks.
_________________________
It says in the article:
Despite the constant security concerns in the country, the homicide rate in Israel is in line with the OECDs average of 2.1 murders per 100,000 people.
Israeli's are very proud and have a working democracy. Threats of physical harm do not deter them from living life to its fullest. You should go there it can be very insprational on many levels. I like that country alot.
One of numerous confounders I thought of was how much of the listed representative populations are on anti-depressants.
You must be really wealthy ....
Hardly!
I’m not hurting, but I’m not wealthy by any means!
I just figured, if this country keeps going the way it is, I should start looking for somewhere else to settle.
Lots of people are happiest when taken care of from cradle to grave, with other people’s money.
RE: I just figured, if this country keeps going the way it is, I should start looking for somewhere else to settle.
______________
OK, let me tell you my personal experience. When I was much younger, I applied to and was approved to get Australian residency. I lived and worked there for 5 years before coming back to the USA.
It was then called the SKILLED LABOR Migration program and is still in existence today. At that time, high tech jobs were in demand. Today, I hear that skilled technicians, especially for the mining industry is in high demand.
Australia (unlike the USA) has a more reasonable immigration policy where SKILLED LABOR and Wealthy individuals (those with the potential to create jobs and who won’t be a burden to their system ) are welcome.
When you apply for migration, you are SCORED based on a POINTS SYSTEM. Unfortunately, the older you are (and if you cannot show that you have the financial means to take care of yourself ), your points are most likely going to be low and your chances of being accepted, also low.
That’s just my experience.
A little more seriously, you have to look very closely at the weighting factors of any of these surveys. I dug deeply into a heavily reported one about which countries had the best medical care. If you scrape away all of the camouflage, it came down to which countries had the most socialized and "fair" health care. It mattered little whether you survived cancer or a heart attack, just so long as the government picked up the tab for your life or death. A country where half the population could afford good care and the other half couldn't would be ranked lower than one where just about no one could afford that care.
Sorry, it was many years ago (maybe when Hillarycare was announced) and I don't remember all the details.
These countries have in common high scores on the secular-rational dimension, on the self actualization dimension, and in prosperity.
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!
Give me an hour or two to come up with some suitable survey questions and I'll show you that North Korea and Zimbabwe are the two happiest nations on earth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.