That’s exactly my argument against her. A Libertarian site I frequent has far too many members who trash religion regularly. When I made the comment that they should at least be grateful for the independent discipline that religion teaches to people, some went bats*** crazy. They don’t seem to understand that less religion = more goverment.
Exactly-—no morality and you have to have a totalitarian government lockdown. No one is safe—no property or life is safe with no morals. All profits would be used just to guard your assets and life and police everyone-—it would be a police state with corrupt police. It is Might makes Right in these lawless societies—No Justice-—like the Wild, Wild West.
Ayn Rand at least accepted “The Laws of Nature”-—which has moral laws. Objectivism was based on “common sense” (rationality) which comes from the “Laws of Nature”. She condemned homosexual acts because of her belief system.
Marx throws out The Laws of Nature-—so he makes up his own Right and Wrong—just arbitrary laws—no Rule of Law-—Rule of Man. He destroys the family—so that kids just have the State to get their worldview from. It is devoid of all humanity. Brave New World shows how “fun” his world is-—no traditions, no Truth, no mother or father or sisters or brothers—no relatives-—all radical egalitarianism with no hope, no love, just government creating and doing everything for you.