Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria
We’re also doing uranium series dating on the bone and that shows they are significantly older again – there’s a difference of about eight to 10,000 years.

Could somebody knowledgeable help me out here? From what little I have read about uranium testing, I did not think it could be done directly to bones, but was done to igneous rock in the vicinity of the bones. And also I was under the impression that the slowness of the half life of most of the uranium cycle's isotopes made made precision to within tens of thousands of years unrealistic.

3 posted on 05/18/2012 12:27:37 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear

It depends on the geological profile of the site itself.

If the body is buried in an area where radioactive isotopes occurr naturally in groundwater, then the age of the bones, which have been absorbing these isotopes slowly over the years, can be dated.

That is how some items, such as carvings in ivory, have been dated in eastern Europe.


4 posted on 05/18/2012 12:45:44 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson