Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

"Victory".

Romney.

Yes. That's not entirely random thoughts, joined together.

Already months ahead of even winning the GOP nomination, Mitt Romney has continued to WIN, each contest he has faced.

That long ago made this long-time Palin supporter, somewhat hostile.

Let's remember the year 2008. The Democrat nominee was Obama. The Democrat nominee was McCain.

(sorry, not a typo)

McCain in a single moment of having one brain cell, decided on the astoundingly successful governor of Alaska as his running mate.

That moment, was electrifying.

Palin fascinated the GOP, and inspired us all. We fell in ... SUPPORT.

We had been waiting since Ronald Reagan himself, to hear such simple truth.

We immediately recognized good.

Great even.

Wait, did this start as a Romney thread?...

Remember what happened, when Palin was introduced by John McCain to America?

Actually, two things:

1) Liberals IMMEDIATELY recognized her as an existential threat to everything they say.

Unfortunately also,

2) Mitt Romney even quicker, recognized she would prevent him from becoming president.

Yes. I believe Mitt Romney sabotaged Palin, and cost the GOP the election in 2008.

There, I said it.

My anti-Romney cred established, he seems about to win the nomination.

By being: ruthless.

It's time to admit Romney is a formidable competitor. But it's also still time to stand and fight.

I'm standing to say, Romney, having accomplished what he set out to do, having infuriated so many of us in the process.

Should now do the right thing, and bring Palin on board as his Vice President.

1 posted on 05/11/2012 8:53:37 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

No.


2 posted on 05/11/2012 8:55:56 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Maybe


4 posted on 05/11/2012 8:59:50 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

How ‘bout “Sheriff Joe” for VEEP?

That would be a Head Turner!


5 posted on 05/11/2012 9:09:50 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

How ‘bout “Sheriff Joe” for VEEP?

That would be a Head Turner!


6 posted on 05/11/2012 9:09:59 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Where are these pictures of Obummer and his kids?
7 posted on 05/11/2012 9:10:20 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Don’t want to see Sarah Palin associated with an A-Hole like Romney. It was bad enough with McPain.


10 posted on 05/11/2012 9:19:41 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It will never happen.

Palin made it clear numerous times that she’ll never be a running mate again. Frankly, being McCain’s running mate is shameful enough. Do you want to saddle her with Romney’s coat tails too? Sarah is smarter than that even if you’re not.


11 posted on 05/11/2012 9:20:32 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Palin is the one with the least negatives IMO for me. Turn her loose and the MSM, Hollyweird, The Democrats, NAACP, NPR, and Nambla (GLAD) will have seizures.
12 posted on 05/11/2012 9:22:38 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

no way. Mitt Romney supporters would be undermining Palin from within like with Mccain camp. Mitt Romney have surrounded himself with too many leftists/establishment types who like the status quo and they all hate Palin more than they hate Obama


14 posted on 05/11/2012 9:24:29 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Good grief.
Why on earth would anybody think Palin would agree to take a second shot at second fiddle?
It's embarrassing.

17 posted on 05/11/2012 9:27:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I suggest you stand well out of Sarah’s reach when you propose this to her, I don’t want her bruising her knuckles.


19 posted on 05/11/2012 9:36:50 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Utter horsesh1t.
Gawd, I get so sick and tired of people flogging this dead argument.
Sarah Palin’s done. That was 4 years ago.
Get over it.


20 posted on 05/11/2012 9:39:25 PM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

She is the only choice.....as in only


26 posted on 05/12/2012 1:39:17 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
No.

Palin should NOT trash herself with the sinking liberal named Romney.
Let the "Establishment Republicans" fall on their own face!


27 posted on 05/12/2012 1:56:44 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Yes. I believe Mitt Romney sabotaged Palin, and cost the GOP the election in 2008. There, I said it.”

OK, you said it.

Can you substantiate it in any way?

And why on earth would she accept anyway?

She’s very young, she can run for President on her own even 8 years from now. That might even be better since her kids would be that much older then.


28 posted on 05/12/2012 2:21:43 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It’s about the ONLY way I’d vote R for Ruling classless party!


30 posted on 05/12/2012 4:19:51 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
>"McCain in a single moment of having one brain cell, decided on the astoundingly successful governor of Alaska as his running mate."

I disagree. I think he purposefully chose her as the WORST possible candidate.

Boy was he WRONG!

He is a libtard after all.

33 posted on 05/12/2012 4:28:30 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Romney should a man ... and pull out.
Gov. Palin could find a good VP for herself and the country.

"But the details of the event are more than unseemly
- they may, in fact, be illegal.
Massachusetts's animal cruelty laws
specifically prohibit anyone from carrying an animal
"in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise,
in an unnecessarily cruel or inhuman manner
or in a way and manner which might endanger
the animal carried thereon.

"An officer for the Massachusetts Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals responded
to a description of the situation saying
"it's definitely something I'd want to check out."
The officer, Nadia Branca, declined to give
a definitive opinion on whether Romney broke the law
but did note that it's against state law to have a dog
in an open bed of a pick-up truck, and
"if the dog was being carried in a way that endangers it,
that would be illegal."

34 posted on 05/12/2012 5:01:00 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I keep seeing a lot of gyrations to either make Romney palatable, or bury him with the trash.

What I don't see is any sort of really organized movement to remove Obama from the White House he sullies and stains every day he remains in office.

While I don't see a viable option at this time, it would be nice to not see what can be perceived as a milling bunch of cattle as our side flails about. If we can't support someone else 9who is actually in the race), then how about spreading beyond FR's borders and shouting to the hills how bad Obama is and why? How many folks just post here and become FR couch potatoes with little to no hope, vs. those who spend time and energy spreading the truth about Obama? The more voices raised, and the more diverse the forums, the better the chance that some will hear and understand and move to the "get rid of Obama" side of the aisle.

35 posted on 05/12/2012 5:12:25 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Don’t know.

Do know that if Romney can’t find himself a Palin somewhere...we all get to enjoy the ‘Bamster for another four....


38 posted on 05/12/2012 5:53:34 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson