Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The case for Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin.
(that new FR journalism MSM s_cks thing ... vanity)

Posted on 05/11/2012 8:53:23 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

Have been thinking about the topic of victory...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
"Victory".

Romney.

Yes. That's not entirely random thoughts, joined together.

Already months ahead of even winning the GOP nomination, Mitt Romney has continued to WIN, each contest he has faced.

That long ago made this long-time Palin supporter, somewhat hostile.

Let's remember the year 2008. The Democrat nominee was Obama. The Democrat nominee was McCain.

(sorry, not a typo)

McCain in a single moment of having one brain cell, decided on the astoundingly successful governor of Alaska as his running mate.

That moment, was electrifying.

Palin fascinated the GOP, and inspired us all. We fell in ... SUPPORT.

We had been waiting since Ronald Reagan himself, to hear such simple truth.

We immediately recognized good.

Great even.

Wait, did this start as a Romney thread?...

Remember what happened, when Palin was introduced by John McCain to America?

Actually, two things:

1) Liberals IMMEDIATELY recognized her as an existential threat to everything they say.

Unfortunately also,

2) Mitt Romney even quicker, recognized she would prevent him from becoming president.

Yes. I believe Mitt Romney sabotaged Palin, and cost the GOP the election in 2008.

There, I said it.

My anti-Romney cred established, he seems about to win the nomination.

By being: ruthless.

It's time to admit Romney is a formidable competitor. But it's also still time to stand and fight.

I'm standing to say, Romney, having accomplished what he set out to do, having infuriated so many of us in the process.

Should now do the right thing, and bring Palin on board as his Vice President.

1 posted on 05/11/2012 8:53:37 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

No.


2 posted on 05/11/2012 8:55:56 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Yes.


3 posted on 05/11/2012 8:57:43 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Vote for the straight guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Maybe


4 posted on 05/11/2012 8:59:50 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

How ‘bout “Sheriff Joe” for VEEP?

That would be a Head Turner!


5 posted on 05/11/2012 9:09:50 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

How ‘bout “Sheriff Joe” for VEEP?

That would be a Head Turner!


6 posted on 05/11/2012 9:09:59 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Where are these pictures of Obummer and his kids?
7 posted on 05/11/2012 9:10:20 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Where are these pictures of Obummer and his kids?

Sealed or scrubbed...with the rest of his records.

8 posted on 05/11/2012 9:16:28 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“Maybe” works. I second.

So far recently we’ve heard Marco Rubio (who I like) mentioned, but then in seeming flashback to Bush administration stupidity, continuing to hammer amnesty under another name.

Then (unbelievably) Huckabee. UGH NO.

Today Jindal. At least we’re making progress.

Romney needs to understand a lot of us out here in America understand competition. We recognize that winning, means making someone else lose.

No problem.

But it’s important to shake the hand of the ONE who actually was your competition.

Mr. Romney do the right thing.

Palin would energize even those, who loathe you right now.

Yes. Loathe.

Consider Palin.

There’s a reason, you went after her first.

She’s formidable.

And a whole lot of us out here, support her.


9 posted on 05/11/2012 9:17:47 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Vote for the straight guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Don’t want to see Sarah Palin associated with an A-Hole like Romney. It was bad enough with McPain.


10 posted on 05/11/2012 9:19:41 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It will never happen.

Palin made it clear numerous times that she’ll never be a running mate again. Frankly, being McCain’s running mate is shameful enough. Do you want to saddle her with Romney’s coat tails too? Sarah is smarter than that even if you’re not.


11 posted on 05/11/2012 9:20:32 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Palin is the one with the least negatives IMO for me. Turn her loose and the MSM, Hollyweird, The Democrats, NAACP, NPR, and Nambla (GLAD) will have seizures.
12 posted on 05/11/2012 9:22:38 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I have never claimed to be smart.

Just riled up. :D


13 posted on 05/11/2012 9:23:02 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Vote for the straight guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

no way. Mitt Romney supporters would be undermining Palin from within like with Mccain camp. Mitt Romney have surrounded himself with too many leftists/establishment types who like the status quo and they all hate Palin more than they hate Obama


14 posted on 05/11/2012 9:24:29 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I was being a smart ass, but I agree with your analysis.

I don’t think she would accept, nor would it be offered, but the potential impact would be similar to 2008, and being “older and wiser” she would only accept if she had a completely free hand to do it her way (which is why I says Mitt would never make the offer). But if he were in deep trouble and losing the conservative base, what better VP candidate to secure it?

Palin might accept if she’d got her aim set on 2016 or 2020, as she’d still be young (mid 50s) enough and having served as VP would be a means to prove herself (although there aren’t many examples of VP stepping into the big chair). So “maybe” isn’t such a bad answer I guess.


15 posted on 05/11/2012 9:25:07 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

You summed it up.


16 posted on 05/11/2012 9:26:52 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Good grief.
Why on earth would anybody think Palin would agree to take a second shot at second fiddle?
It's embarrassing.

17 posted on 05/11/2012 9:27:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

LOL that guy rocks! :D

He exemplifies everything funny about FR.

For Palin threads, someone should photoshop him into a Nanook of the North fur-lined hoodie.


18 posted on 05/11/2012 9:32:28 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Vote for the straight guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I suggest you stand well out of Sarah’s reach when you propose this to her, I don’t want her bruising her knuckles.


19 posted on 05/11/2012 9:36:50 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Utter horsesh1t.
Gawd, I get so sick and tired of people flogging this dead argument.
Sarah Palin’s done. That was 4 years ago.
Get over it.


20 posted on 05/11/2012 9:39:25 PM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson