Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I guess I'm a horrible person.

Posted on 05/11/2012 8:46:14 PM PDT by LouAvul

After reading about Romney having no problem w/fags adopting children, I'm not going to vote if he gets the nomination.

2 John 11: "For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

Maybe I've voted in my last election.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: LouAvul

Vote down ticket.


101 posted on 05/12/2012 4:37:11 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Are you willing to denounce your DNC II registration?

I AM.

102 posted on 05/12/2012 4:41:44 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greene66
the whole upper-echelon Republican Party apparatus is being run by fifth-columnist style Democrat saboteurs.

The DNC II party.

103 posted on 05/12/2012 4:44:36 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

If Romney, like McCain before him, goes down in flames - perhaps, just PERHAPS the GOP will figure it out that a Conservative is the one they need to put the effort into.

Unless the GOP elite’s goals are compatible with the socialist left and it doesn’t really matter to them which party wins.


104 posted on 05/12/2012 4:46:30 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
Unless the GOP elite’s goals are compatible with the socialist left

Didn't need the unless.

105 posted on 05/12/2012 4:48:23 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: papageo
We are bound by his words to obey those in government power.

Add 'legitimate' and we'll see .. otherwise, color me Infidel.


106 posted on 05/12/2012 4:48:49 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CalvaryJohn
>"If you want to live in a theocracy, you will have to sacrifice some of your freedom.

We live in an Athiestocracy now.

Moses, and Jesus are illegal.

Abortion and sexual deviancy are openly accepted and subsidized by our govt.

Don't be so intolerant of intolerance.

107 posted on 05/12/2012 5:05:57 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Horrible? Nope. Stupid? YES.


108 posted on 05/12/2012 5:06:48 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
ROMNEY WON WITH VOTES FROM REPUBLICANS. I swear I don’t understand you people. Did you work for your primary candidate? Are you a PC? Did you give money. You’re all just Blah.blah..blah. Frankly I am sick of it. On behalf of all of us out here in the trenches, please leave the Party.

We did.

109 posted on 05/12/2012 5:17:12 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

VOTE. Just vote conservative downticket. Write in your presidential vote.


110 posted on 05/12/2012 5:24:44 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papageo; LouAvul

Before you try to lay that on anyone you may want to study what God says about a nation that has turned away from Him. A couple of passages you could start with are Isaiah 59:1-2 and Judges 6:1. Jeremiah 7:15 gives another hint as to giving support to evil.


111 posted on 05/12/2012 6:22:55 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
The best I can say is that Romney is horrible, terrible and simply the worst candidate we could possibly have at this point in history.

And obama is worse.

Good luck, keep praying, FRiend...

112 posted on 05/12/2012 6:26:25 AM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Vote for Goode, not for Evil.


113 posted on 05/12/2012 6:54:40 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Horrible person? No. You just don’t want to share in the sin of an abortion-loving homosexual panderer by choosing him to lead this nation.

Just go and vote conservative downticket.


114 posted on 05/12/2012 7:26:56 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"the Republican Party, save Reagan, have been about guys like Mitt."

Yep. Rush said it a while back: the Republican party has never been conservative. It's a moderate party which tolerates the conservatives within its ranks. Only now, it's gotten to the point that it holds us in open contempt.

115 posted on 05/12/2012 7:30:38 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
"I will just add this to my list of reasons not to vote in the Nov. elections."

I wasn't planning on voting for him anyway, but this latest revelation will be added to the list.

And I know Ann Romney shouldn't be considered when it comes to voting, but it's been reported she recently said that Moochelle Obama is "lovely." Just another example of Romney bad taste. :-P

116 posted on 05/12/2012 8:11:10 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

For the sake of our nation, I sincerely hope you are not in a “swing state.”


117 posted on 05/12/2012 8:40:27 AM PDT by newzjunkey (I advocate separation of school and sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
"I cannot blame you for thinking you are standing up for principles, but what is our alternative?"

I understand your line of thinking. I held my nose and voted for McCain, only because of Palin. For me, holding my nose and voting for Romney this time around is something I don't think I'm going to be able to do. To me its no different than the Republicans in Congress going along with the Democrats, just to get along...even when they are in the majority. We bitch about them doing that all the time, not having any backbone, then we turn around, and go along with the GOP at the voting booth, despite how we feel about the candidate they've chosen for us. I would rather send the GOP a message that their hand-picked RINOS will no longer be tolerated. How each one of us does that is our decision on election day.

118 posted on 05/12/2012 8:47:00 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You are very right about that. Last time, Obama told us what he was going to do, we just tried hard to pray that he really meant there were no red, or blue states, but the United States. HA! Great one liner, wasn’t it? He meant the United States would be ALL BLUE. ha. The joke was on us.

Hillary drove him into policy wonking, or a lot of his lefty tones would never have been seen at all, even as well as they were.

Except for Newt, Romney was never driven anywhere to be forced to come up with more than the usual platitudes. He remains a policy mystery on a wing and a prayer, except for his record of severe socialism in MA.


119 posted on 05/12/2012 9:00:36 AM PDT by RitaOK (Nevermind, Newt. Forget the convention. I'm trusting God for the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tommix2; All
We should ask people with children, “If something happened to you , would you want the government to turn your children over to a couple of queers to be raised?

You are absolutely ridiculous. Your loathing of homosexuals has rendered you senseless. When parents die, children are usually taken by relatives or wherever the parents have already designated if they're truly acting responsibly. The idea of random homosexuals adopting your children because you've died is so ridiculously remote as to be nothing more than monster-in-the-closet childish fear mongering.

If you are leaving your childrens' fates to government upon your deaths, you have no business being parents.

You'd probably go so far as to interfere with parents' decision-making with regard to those deemed best to raise the kids in their absence because a few might consider a trusted homosexual relative.

120 posted on 05/12/2012 9:00:36 AM PDT by newzjunkey (I advocate separation of school and sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson