[tpanther]

I read a good bit of the article...it presupposes that evolution is true, and then goes on to say why, by supplying “evidence”.

It takes a jab at creationists and throws in that’s not science.

The point of MY article is, neither is evolution.

Then there’s my tagline.

[Aevery_Freeman]

Yes, it did provide "evidence" but one has to be capable of "logic" to interpret the evidence.

Evolution is one of Gods' more ingenious creations allowing his creatures to adapt and evolve to suit the universe he created for them.

Thanks, God, well-played!

[muir_redwoods]

Supplying evidence to demonstrate the truth of something is how science is one. Asserting the contrary with nothing but capital letters is not how science is done.