Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
It's the fact that hockey does not translate well to television at all.

I've heard that before, and I remember Fox's noble but failed experiment with computers to make the puck more visible.

I have never found hockety to be problematic on TV ... IF YOU HAVE GOOD CAMERAS AND A STATION THAT KNOWS HOW TO USE THEM.

I am a lapsed Kings fan from the Triple Crown era. I lived in CT. The Kings would typically get second place in the Norris division (behind Montreal), and the Bruins would typically win the Adams division. Around Round 2 the Kings would play the Bruins. The folks at WSBK-TV38 were exceptional with their coverage. But when I stayed up late to watch the games in L.A. (where the Kings wore those crazy Dr. Dentons) the cameras were largely obscured by PEOPLE SITTING IN FRONT OF THEM! This was in the old forum, but for some reason the Lakers games in the same building didn't have that problem. The cameramen (or the guy at the switchboard) could not antipate where the puck was going. No zoom-ins behind the net. Awful. You'd think a big city based famous for TV and movies would have done better.

Of course, it might be better now. I haven't kept up.
33 posted on 05/04/2012 7:40:09 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

I think wide screen HD has helped hockey more than any other sport.


37 posted on 05/04/2012 7:56:19 PM PDT by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

I think wide screen HD has helped hockey more than any other sport.


38 posted on 05/04/2012 7:56:19 PM PDT by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

I think wide screen HD has helped hockey more than any other sport.


39 posted on 05/04/2012 7:57:00 PM PDT by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana
It's definitely better now, and I'll tell you something else: You should see what NFL broadcasts looked like back in the early days of televised games. NFL Films has a DVD collection that traces the history of televised football, and it's amazing how ridiculous things were back then. Jittery cameramen, cameras that didn't work well in cold weather, poor camera angles, etc. were some of the early glitches they had to deal with.

Now, the NFL has taken it to the exact opposite extreme. It's so oriented towards a TV audience that attending a game in person can be a boring ordeal.

40 posted on 05/04/2012 7:58:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

Being a Kings fan from CT have anything to do with the New Haven Knighthawks, a Kings’ farm team.


45 posted on 05/04/2012 8:12:28 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson