Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
I'm afraid the case he makes is indisputable.

Nothing personal, but until I know your bona fides, that statement is meaningless.

Wish I could remember the web site to get a personal science literacy IQ to qualify you to make such an arrogant statement.

71 posted on 04/22/2012 9:19:35 PM PDT by Publius6961 ("It's easy to make promises you can't keep" - B.H.Obama Feb 23, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
Nothing personal, but until I know your bona fides, that statement is meaningless.

My only bona fides are that I've got eyeballs and can see what I'm seeing in front of me.

Watch the videos. Sure, it's just a theoretical model, but what's indisputable is that the land masses of earth fit neatly together in a seamless jig-saw puzzle when you shrink the planet.

Same holds true for other planets the author has applied his model to.

The point I am making, is that the model does what he says it does, which is confirmed by the viewer's observation. His theory doesn't seem to address why or how planets expand, but that's what real science is all about. It's a quest to explain the how and why of the universe. The door is open for others to discover the mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

75 posted on 04/22/2012 9:35:46 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson