Ya think this is going to be used to target political speech?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: mamelukesabre
BTW, PC is better than MAC.
2 posted on
04/05/2012 4:44:02 PM PDT by
mamelukesabre
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line)
To: mamelukesabre
I don’t know—but I find the whole thing annoying.............
3 posted on
04/05/2012 4:45:15 PM PDT by
basil
(It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
To: mamelukesabre
I don’t know but if I were in Arizona I’d be on a first name basis with Joe Arpio. LOL
4 posted on
04/05/2012 4:45:50 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: mamelukesabre
Sounds quite unenforcable to me.
5 posted on
04/05/2012 4:46:06 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: mamelukesabre
What stupid idiots thought this was a good idea?
Thats right...I said it...come and get me....
ATTICA ATTICA ATTICA....
What a crock...
9 posted on
04/05/2012 4:48:48 PM PDT by
Adder
(Da bro has GOT to go!)
To: mamelukesabre
If it means the end of annoying ‘news anchors’. Now we are talking sense.
Question: If you get paid to promote propaganda on the MSM - is it FREE SPEECH??
10 posted on
04/05/2012 4:49:02 PM PDT by
sodpoodle
(Newtrition - soul food for a starving America.)
To: mamelukesabre
This is insanity.
That is the kind of speech they were thinking of when they wrote the first amendment. It wasn’t meant to protect pornographers it was meant to protect dissent and opinions.
11 posted on
04/05/2012 4:49:04 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: mamelukesabre
So this means that the Lib Troll Forum also known as “AZCentral.com,” formerly known as the liberal newsrag The Arizona Republic, will be shut down entirely as this law is enforced, correct? That forum consists of nothing but mindless Obama Drones piddling their twaddle all over it.
14 posted on
04/05/2012 4:49:33 PM PDT by
ponygirl
(Be Breitbart.)
To: mamelukesabre
Awesome! Hope the bastards get jail time.
18 posted on
04/05/2012 5:00:14 PM PDT by
MNDude
To: mamelukesabre
Who decides who is annoying?
To: mamelukesabre
We don’t arrest and prosecute them here on FR. Trolls are zot on sight.
20 posted on
04/05/2012 5:01:33 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
To: mamelukesabre
I find Mr. Williams bill to be annoying.
When does he go to jail?
21 posted on
04/05/2012 5:02:08 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
To: mamelukesabre
“A bi-partisan bill would make it a criminal offense to post online comments that could be construed as “annoying” or “offensive””.
I find this suggestion for such a bi-partisan bill to be both annoying and offensive.
22 posted on
04/05/2012 5:08:55 PM PDT by
Enough is ENOUGH
(The PC name for 'trashing our Constitution' is fundamental transformation.)
To: mamelukesabre
26 posted on
04/05/2012 5:27:48 PM PDT by
VanDeKoik
(If case you are wondering, I'm supporting Newt.)
To: mamelukesabre
In some states there are already cyber-bullying laws, which IMO place unconstitutional restrictions on speech.
28 posted on
04/05/2012 5:31:29 PM PDT by
matt1234
(Bring back the HUAC.)
To: mamelukesabre
"A bi-partisan bill would make it a criminal offense to post online comments that could be construed as "annoying" or "offensive," according to the Associated Press."
Your calender may say 2012 but we are living 1984!
29 posted on
04/05/2012 5:32:07 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: mamelukesabre
“Rep. Vic Williams”.
Good grief, he’s a Republican! What the heck is wrong with him?
30 posted on
04/05/2012 5:36:01 PM PDT by
SuzyQue
To: mamelukesabre
If enacted, this would be a serious competitor for the law that was found unconstitutional in the shortest amount of time.
31 posted on
04/05/2012 5:38:33 PM PDT by
Oceander
(TINSTAAFL - Mother Nature Abhors a Free Lunch almost as much as She Abhors a Vacuum)
To: mamelukesabre
33 posted on
04/05/2012 5:39:34 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: mamelukesabre
YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT.
I QUESTION YOUR HERITAGE AND YOUR MOTHER’S FIDELITY AND YOUR GENERAL INTELLIGENCE.
Sorry, had to get one more in while it’s still legal.
35 posted on
04/05/2012 5:42:49 PM PDT by
sbMKE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
