To: yarddog
There’s even a high definition frame capture of a small trickle of blood coming down from the wound. A LOT can be missed in video.. It’s not at all like the old ‘film’ days. What was the cop staring at?.. An ingrown hair? I doubt it. This will backfire on the left worse than ‘Fluke’ did. The cops are doing a good job of withholding information on this case so there can be one huge collective laugh at the media, black panthers, etc. later..
To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
I doubt it. This will backfire on the left worse than Fluke did.
This is just Fluke II, Deeper and Dirtier. After the first one bombed, they had to come up with something else to accomplish what didn't work in Fluke I as well as something to draw attention away from how badly they got skunked the first time around. I hope someone is able to do a Tweet history of this and show who it was who located the story after searching for something to use in this manner and then started the ball rolling (via a Journolist 2?).
53 posted on
04/01/2012 7:03:44 PM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson