>>Methinks you would be better served attending to how YOU look on this thread than worrying about how I look.<<
Note you still haven’t answered my questions. And yes, your responses “illustrate how it leads to an absurd consequence.”
You have been bested in every category. Your forensic knowledge is shallow, your examples absurd, your reasoning illogical. Your entire “thesis” (I am kind in wrapping your rantings into such a cocoon) makes no logical sense and fails many, if not all, of the precepts of logic.
If I was you, I would withdraw. You don’t even have to admit defeat. Just say nothing and after some time you will have salvaged simple defeat from a thrashing.
You are delusional. Please demonstrate how my “responses ... leads to an
absurd consequence.”’
Furthermore, I am under no obligation to provide you with links or answers that serve no purpose but to aid YOUR contentions.
Surely you know, despite your laughable attempts at diagnosing fallacies, denying the premise of a question is not the same thing as refusing to answer it.
I already told you I disagreed with your premise, so why do you keep insisting I won’t answer your question?
The funny thing is, I’m fascinated now. It’s like arguing with Blanche Dubois, or little kids playing “cowboys and indians.” No matter how soundly you get “hit” you rhetorically jump to the side and shout “YOU MISSED!”