Oh, you think so?
You think asking for links to another scenario of the exact same circumstances as the one under consideration, but with a different outcome predicated on the sex of the subject is a reasonable request?
And where do you see an absurdum argument?
You use “logical fallacies” like a kid faking an accent.
>>And where do you see an absurdum argument?<<
Your argument makes no sense in any way, shape or form. Thus it is an argumentum ad absurdum.
>>You use “logical fallacies” like a kid faking an accent.<<
The fact you don’t understand them, nor can you actually specifically cite a specific link that backs up your contention (actually, now, an assertion), is an indictment on you, not me.
Everyone reading this must note you have not even tried to rebut my specific forensic addressing of your statements.
You analogies fail. Your attempts to misdirect fail. Your ad absurdum and ad hominem fail. I ask a direct question, you cannot answer it.
You fail.
Please quit embarrassing yourself. And FR.
Really.