[Wonder Warthog]

"So good science to you is gory details, which in this case are absent. Is it any wonder you are having trouble convincing anyone who isn't gullible? And while this isn't a real scientific paper, it's the reference you provided.

Science absolutely is the "gory details". What, you think it's "all about theory"??

Yes, it "is" the reference I provided, which is a summary (equivalent to an abstract of a full paper). You apparently choose to ignore the OTHER reference (to the full report on the work), which I am currently trying to locate. The number of that report is appended to the slides.

[Moonman62]

Science absolutely is the "gory details". What, you think it's "all about theory"??

I think the burden is on you to show that your promotion of cold fusion is more than hype. You're the one who is leaving out the "gory details" (your words), or any convincing logical case for cold fusion based on them. Repeating claims of people you trust because they are claiming what you want to hear, and putting the burden of research on those you are trying to convince is nothing more than hype.

You apparently choose to ignore the OTHER reference (to the full report on the work), which I am currently trying to locate. The number of that report is appended to the slides.

How can I not help but "ignore" it when even you are having a hard time locating it?