I think the burden is on you to show that your promotion of cold fusion is more than hype. You're the one who is leaving out the "gory details" (your words), or any convincing logical case for cold fusion based on them. Repeating claims of people you trust because they are claiming what you want to hear, and putting the burden of research on those you are trying to convince is nothing more than hype.
You apparently choose to ignore the OTHER reference (to the full report on the work), which I am currently trying to locate. The number of that report is appended to the slides.
How can I not help but "ignore" it when even you are having a hard time locating it?
LOL. I haven't even started to look for it yet. There is this thing called "work" that one does..you might be acquainted with it. But the reference to the report is there....nothing is stopping you from doing a Google search for it, now is there.