But this is cold fusion. All they have to do is get a tiny, brief unexplainable effect and then run off to do a press release for the cold fusion fan boys.
More desperation. These are slides from a talk, which, as with any such, hits the high points, and leaves out much of the gory detail.
So good science to you is gory details, which in this case are absent. Is it any wonder you are having trouble convincing anyone who isn't gullible?
And while this isn't a real scientific paper, it's the reference you provided.
Science absolutely is the "gory details". What, you think it's "all about theory"??
Yes, it "is" the reference I provided, which is a summary (equivalent to an abstract of a full paper). You apparently choose to ignore the OTHER reference (to the full report on the work), which I am currently trying to locate. The number of that report is appended to the slides.