More loading/unloading data on the temperature evolution of the loading/unloading process should be collectedIt's clear they aren't claiming nuclear reactions as a source for the heat yet, but are recommending good tests to find out whether it is. So if this is so important why haven't these recommended tests been carried out yet?Analysis of the gas samples collected should be performed to look for evidence of tritium or helium
Mass spectrum analysis and optical emission spectrum analysis should be able to identify gas species in the samples
Existence of either in the sample would indicate a nuclear origin for the anomalous heating
Further examination of the thermodynamics of hydrogen absorption in palladium should be pursued to fully quantify the extent of the observed heating effects
Improve experiment controls:
Upgrade Purifier heater control
Improve loading/unloading process timing
Fabricate in-house palladium samples
Improve neutron and gamma radiation detection
Uh, this is precisely the set of slides that I posted a link to in a previous thread.
"It's clear they aren't claiming nuclear reactions as a source for the heat yet, but are recommending good tests to find out whether it is."
The results of which "good tests" already exist, having been done by other CF researchers. It certainly can't hurt to gather more data on this specific implementation.
"So if this is so important why haven't these recommended tests been carried out yet?"
Good question. Anybody with two brain cells understands the importance of a clean, compact energy source. See previous discussion about "groupthink" and active prevention of funding. I know you don't believe that exists, but there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.