Uh, this is precisely the set of slides that I posted a link to in a previous thread.
"It's clear they aren't claiming nuclear reactions as a source for the heat yet, but are recommending good tests to find out whether it is."
The results of which "good tests" already exist, having been done by other CF researchers. It certainly can't hurt to gather more data on this specific implementation.
"So if this is so important why haven't these recommended tests been carried out yet?"
Good question. Anybody with two brain cells understands the importance of a clean, compact energy source. See previous discussion about "groupthink" and active prevention of funding. I know you don't believe that exists, but there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.
Yes, but that doesn't mean cold fusion (other than muon) exists, or if it does, that it would be useful as an energy source.
See previous discussion about "groupthink" and active prevention of funding.
All they need is a hydrogen purifier, some deuterium, and a mass spectrometer. I don't think your paranoid groupthink/conspiracy theory could prevent everybody in the world from coming up with that stuff for over 20 years.
I know you don't believe that exists, but there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.
No evidence except "Warthog says so."