[ml/nj]

A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama

Do you seriously think Romney would appoint another "wise Latina" to the Court?

Watch the Brietbart 2012 CPAC Speech, all the way to the end and get back to me.

ML/NJ

[BlackElk]

Given his general dishonesty, I would expect that the "wise Latina" may, by accident, be better than what he would appoint. Steven Breyer certainly has been and will be better. I think Robamney will appoint, at best, nothing but John Paul Stevens, a David "Swish" Souter, a William Brennan, a Lewis Powell or a Herod Blackmun (all appointed by Republican presidents) but NEVER appoint anyone worth appointing and therefore the old "The boogie man will get you and SCOTUS if you don't vote for a "GOP" ideological treasonweasel is not going to work again. I have voted Republican or "Republican for each and every GOP POTUS nominee starting in 1968, including some of the worst crap ever to be elected or defeated (Ford, Dole, McShame, etc.). That's all over with now and forever. I am not adding a vote for Robamney to those sins. If you don't want Obozo, then defeat Robamney before the convention or it will be too late. Without the support of actual conservatives, Robamney is not going to win and he can't buy their votes. He's got nothing worth voting for and nothing that can be believed by any rational conservative.

I don't care who Robamney chooses for VP. I don't care what additional lies he tells to snooker the sheeple. I don't care if each and every Founding Father rises from the dead to endorse Robamney who is nothing more than Obozo in white face. I don't even care if Ronald Reagan rises from the dead to endorse Robamney. He does not get my vote or the vote of anyone I can influence. Not now and not ever.

[SoConPubbie]

Do you seriously think Romney would appoint another "wise Latina" to the Court? The real question is, Do you seriously believe his judicial picks will be any better than his past picks given his penchant for lying?

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.”

“These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.