Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tex-Con-Man

“There is zero evidence that Zimmerman prevented a potential crime, or that Martin had criminal intent.”

You could not be more wrong. There is strong evidence to believe that Martin attacked Zimmerman (criminal intent) and that Zimmerman prevented, not only a potential crime (Zimmerman’s murder), but an actual crime (Zimmerman’s beating).


81 posted on 03/25/2012 10:30:28 AM PDT by Lucas McCain (Santorum sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Lucas McCain; Tex-Con-Man
There is strong evidence to believe that Martin attacked Zimmerman (criminal intent) and that Zimmerman prevented, not only a potential crime (Zimmerman’s murder), but an actual crime (Zimmerman’s beating).

____________________________________

Well, if there is strong evidence then it should be really easy for you ti provide a link to it.....why don't you?

85 posted on 03/25/2012 10:35:50 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Lucas McCain
You're selectively editing the entire series of events to leave out what led up to the fight...a significant part of the big picture. And if one is interested in the truth, you can't ignore the parts you don't like.
89 posted on 03/25/2012 10:50:37 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson