1 posted on
03/06/2012 8:07:55 PM PST by
BenLurkin
2 posted on
03/06/2012 8:08:35 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
Some “professors” don’t have enough to do.
3 posted on
03/06/2012 8:12:48 PM PST by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Hope springs eternal - maybe the Bucs will break .500 this year)
To: BenLurkin
Thank Heavens it is Bush’s fault!
4 posted on
03/06/2012 8:14:01 PM PST by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: BenLurkin; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; stylecouncilor; the OlLine Rebel; kalee; Vigilanteman; ...
This is certainly interesting enough to merit a mention to all on the Titanic Ping List. If you wish to be added to (or removed from) the list, please FReepmail me. We're rapidly approaching the 100th Anniversary of the
RMS Titanic disaster and interest is increasing.
It's also been documented that the extraordinarily eerie, flat calm conditions of that night contributed to the inability to spot the berg.
5 posted on
03/06/2012 8:16:44 PM PST by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
To: BenLurkin
BLEW IT UP!!!
That’ll stop all the werewolf attacks, too.
To: BenLurkin
Did the Moon cause the shoddy rivets and overall poor shipbuilding as well?
7 posted on
03/06/2012 8:20:40 PM PST by
frogjerk
(OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
To: BenLurkin
Sometimes God uses a bank shot!
10 posted on
03/06/2012 8:33:11 PM PST by
The Shrew
(www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
To: BenLurkin
The whole story is bull $hit !!! If we had a little global warming in 1912, that ice wouldn't have even been there, as it would have been melted. But, there still would have been a problem....the ship would have run into tens of thousands of floating dead polar bears and probably would have sunk anyway. Hey, I know my stuff...I didn't spend 21 years in the Navy for nothing.
By the way, did I ever tell you about the time I was on an around-the-world cruise and we ..........oh, never mind, it's time to let the pups out, so I'll tell you next time. : )
13 posted on
03/06/2012 8:47:22 PM PST by
jmax
(SLUTS SUCK WHILE MAKING IT ON SLEEP NUMBER BEDS)
To: BenLurkin; SunkenCiv; no-to-illegals; blam; decimon; All
A more likely theory is that excessive cold caused by air borne ash from Katmai/Novarupta in Alaska made for unusually heavy sea ice formation. Of course a very high tide could have contributed to the problem. That year, a major attempt for the south pole was also foiled by unusually cold Antarctic summer weather probably from the same volcanic cause.
To: BenLurkin
This is also the cover story for the April, 2012 issue of Sky and Telescope. The article there goes into much more detail.
24 posted on
03/07/2012 5:35:59 AM PST by
Roccus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson