Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inglorious beginnings: Experts trace humanity's origins to ancient worm
vancouversun.com ^ | March 5, 2012 | Jen Gerson

Posted on 03/05/2012 12:08:48 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

CALGARY — It seems an inglorious beginning, but some scientists are now convinced humanity's origins can be traced to an ancient, flat, fishlike worm.

A team of researchers subjected the 505-million-year-old Burgess shale fossils of Pikaia gracilens to the latest technology and found evidence that could settle a decades-long debate about the primitive species.

Notably, that they had the seeds of a spine.

"We can see and discern the positive location of the notochord and the nerve chord. This was not obvious at all, you needed these techniques to see it," said Jean-Bernard Caron, the curator of invertebrate paleontology at the Royal Ontario Museum.

Caron is the co-author of a study to be published Monday in the British journal, Biological Reviews. The lead author was English paleontologist Simon Conway Morris.

The earliest explorers of the Burgess shale collected specimens of Pikaia in 1911. But the creature was overlooked as an ancestor of the earthworm.

"They had no idea it might be something more important to us then, at first sight," Caron said.

(Excerpt) Read more at vancouversun.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

Yes, yes, it’s always something ridiculous. A chimp, a worm, an amoeba.

I know better.


21 posted on 03/05/2012 12:59:24 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
If only we can invent a genesis that does not involve accountability to an omnipotent, omniscient, moral creator, then we can live as we like.

No, you cannot live as you like if your evolutionary success has been underpinned by the formation of stable, successful and inter-dependent, non-parasitic societies, which itself is underpinned by the ethics of reciprocity - to not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

22 posted on 03/05/2012 1:07:18 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
If only we can invent a genesis that does not involve accountability to an omnipotent, omniscient, moral creator, then we can live as we like. This is why John Lennon wrote his song, "Imagine".

It nevertheless escapes me how expanding our understanding of the physical processes of this world somehow impacts the premise that there is a Creator.

23 posted on 03/05/2012 1:15:19 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I could never muster up enough faith to believe in evolution. My hat is off to the true believers of that religion. If only more Christians could have that kind of faith....


24 posted on 03/05/2012 1:19:35 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“Some” scientists are convinced. Probably the same ones that are convinced increased taxes will make the ocean recede.


25 posted on 03/05/2012 1:37:40 PM PST by Hayride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
axolotls
26 posted on 03/05/2012 1:39:27 PM PST by caveat emptor (Zippity Do Dah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This thread is begging for a Helen Thomas pic.


27 posted on 03/05/2012 1:40:15 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Because for some it is “magic” or NOTHING.

Unless God created the world using magical mystical miraculous means - they think there is no need for a God if God used the natural laws HE designed to carry it out.

The Bible says that I am formed “from dust” and “to dust” I will return. I was also formed via cellular processes involving DNA. Was my creation “from dust” less literal than the creation of Adam “from dust”, or is it possible that cellular processes involving DNA were also involved in the creation of Adam?


28 posted on 03/05/2012 1:42:01 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
I have always found this approach to Creationism to be awfully limited, and ultimately dishonoring to the Creator... as though a person is saying "God can only have created the world in the way I understand and believe Him to have done it. Period."

I wonder how impressed God is with that idea?

29 posted on 03/05/2012 1:48:54 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
The Bible tells us that the Heavens proclaim the glory of God.

According to Creationists the Heavens proclaim that God cannot really be trusted - as he made a universe that consistently looks billions of years old using any of several independently measured features - but he was just foolin’; because it is really only a few thousand years old.

Creationism is very much like “last Thursday-ism”; the idea that the entire world was created with a false memory and a false past just last Thursday.

Great! Even if correct, any measure or estimate using the “true” age of the universe (last Thursday) will lead nowhere and to nothing; while an estimate using the “incorrect” age that the universe only “appears” to be - will be accurate, explain data, and lead to further discovery and application.

So Creationism, even if “correct” is absolutely useless in terms of explaining data, making predictions, and enabling further discovery.

Science is of use.

Creationism is useless.

30 posted on 03/05/2012 1:55:08 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Probably more impressed than with those who seek to make Him a liar.


31 posted on 03/05/2012 1:59:13 PM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Oh, Creationism has its uses, but as a philosophical underpinning, not as an applied science.

Science answers the question "How?" while faith answers the question "Why?". Neither is dispensible.

32 posted on 03/05/2012 2:01:46 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Probably more impressed than with those who seek to make Him a liar.

If I run into such a one, you can be sure I'll let 'em know.

33 posted on 03/05/2012 2:03:08 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
The concept that the world was created and obeys set and ordered laws is useful as a philosophical underpinning - that the universe itself isn't understandable via natural means because God used miracles to make the world ‘appear’ older - not so much.

If one assumes natural means were used, that is useful because natural means are understandable, measurable, predictable and replicable.

If one assumes miraculous means were used, that is of no use because they are not understandable, measurable, predictable or replicable.

Right now a star is forming off in the universe. To my mind that star is just as “created by God” as our own - and it makes sense to me that the same means were utilized in both instances.

If one assumes our Sun was formed via gravity and nuclear fusion - then measurements and predictions of other stars formed via that mechanism will be applicable to our own star.

If one assumes that our star was formed via miraculous means - then measurements and predictions of other stars formed via gravity and nuclear fusion should be of no use in predicting the behavior of our Sun.

34 posted on 03/05/2012 2:19:19 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon
fluke (n) - trematode, trematode worm

Parasitic flatworms having external suckers for attaching to a host.

First name Sandra???

35 posted on 03/05/2012 2:19:37 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
Made me think of the rather odd expression recorded in Mark 9:47-48, where Jesus says:

"And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. It is better to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, where 'their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.'"

Have always wondered what that means--maybe the DNA helix?

36 posted on 03/05/2012 2:21:56 PM PST by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Yer preachin’ to the choir, amd.


37 posted on 03/05/2012 2:22:30 PM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
Yeah, but talking/typing with you is MUCH more pleasant!

Why I have yet to have my religious faith called into question, my conservative bonafides denied, and told why I am just like HitlerStalinSanger. ;)

38 posted on 03/05/2012 2:29:04 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

The clowns that think-up these pipe dreams are far from being scientists.

The objectivity that is required for science requires something that all of them lack: Honesty.


39 posted on 03/05/2012 2:30:25 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oberon; Cvengr

Satan setting the trap:

>> I have always found this approach to Creationism to be awfully limited, and ultimately dishonoring to the Creator... as though a person is saying “God can only have created the world in the way I understand and believe Him to have done it. Period.” <<

That is the classic strawman that the liars that wish to be considered “scientific” here usually employ. But of course no creationist has ever offered “God can only have created the world in the way I understand and believe Him to have done it. Period.”

What creationists usually state is that YHWH did it in the manner that he stated in his word, and the more than 100 places in his word that clearly state that evolution was not used, are completely accurate.

The lost, dishonest unbelievers that sham as scientists of course reject that emotionally, and hatefully.

Quite a pickle until you realize just who is in control :o)
.


40 posted on 03/05/2012 2:47:59 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson