[lilyfreeper]

Exactly. There was absolutely no reflection on why Sharron Angle, Christine O’Donnell lost on this site.

Santorum, just like them, is just an awful candidate. Outside this echo chamber, they are just a bunch of clowns who’ve damaged conservatives’ reputation.

[Jim from C-Town]

[Jim from C-Town]

I like Newt, would like to vote for him, but the primary objective is to keep Romney from capturing the ‘Romney Wins Ohio’ headlines on Wednesday.

Newt will win GA going away. If Romney wins OH he gets bragging rights and that is a disaster. If he had lost MI he would be damn near out of the race, but Romney squeaked through and won 1/2 the delegates. If he would ha lost by 1% he would still get half the delegates and would have been in BIG TROUBLE.

He loses OHIO and he is in HUGE TROUBLE!

We must keep Romney from winning Ohio and he only viable option is a vote for Santorum in Ohio and a vote for Gingrich in GEORGIA.

I am in Ohio!

[GOPsterinMA]

Christine O’Donnell makes Sharron Angle look like a genius by comparison. Also, if the election in NV wasn't fixed (remember the power went out election night), Angle, warts and all, would have won.

Santorum is a tool; he's a Republican John Kerry.

[entropy12]

Add that candidate Hoffman in NY to that list. Great conservative but disaster as a candidate. Which confirms my belief that a winning candidate is better than a losing candidate regardless of conservative purity. After they lose an election, they have zero power to push any conservative legislation or agenda. Newt probably recognized Hoffman was a disaster and refused to back him.