There is no rational controversy that the obvious disconnection between rotational and orbital periods points to randomness rather than design. I believe I have adequately backed up that assertion with the numbers. If that is either too difficult for you to understand or if you choose to assert a position where that disconnection points to design, I cannot help you further.
I don’t assert the position that it points to design, and to my knowledge, nobody else does. It’s not evidence of either design or randomness, it’s just a simple ratio determined by the laws of physics. Now, the laws of physics that determine what the ratio is, I’d say those are evidence of design, but that’s a whole other argument.