“No, the obvious point I’ve been making is that there is no connection between rotational and orbital periods for the earth.”
Yes, but that is not the whole point of the argument you’ve been making. You have also been saying that this is some evidence that weighs in favor of randomness vs. design.
I don’t think you’ve made a logical argument as to why that would be so, you’ve only used fallacies to support it.
No. You are being obtuse or you really can’t see it. Not my problem