Replies

If it was an assassination using the frozen poison dart, the toxicology report will show nothing. The only evidence left behind would be a tiny dart hole that would look like a bug bite, anywhere on the body since the dart can go through clothes.

If it was an assassination we’d expect family and friends to claim ever more frantically that there was a history of heart disease, in order to protect the wife and 4 kids. As questions arose there would be more alleged details coming out - stuff like him being hospitalized for it a year ago, or a month ago, stuff like him having to move his office because he was winded, etc. And nobody would be able to show either audio or links from those time periods proving that the claims weren’t simply fabricated on March 1st to try to get rid of the suspicions that it was an assassination.

That’s exactly what we’re seeing. When Orson Bean said in the interview with Reuters - which Drudge linked to in an actual attempt to say that Breitbart had a history of heart problems, based on an anonymous claim by a “friend” in that article, that he didn’t know of any cardiac problems, everybody was thinking that everybody would assume it was a heart attack, especially since the Big sites were claiming he had died of natural causes.

When a lot of people noted the timing with the Arpaio presser and Breitbart’s own comment about “Wait until they see what happens March 1!”, together with the information about the frozen poison dart that mimics a heart attack and leaves no evidence except the dart prick, that raised suspicions even more. And when Jerry Corsi indicated that Breitbart had interviewed Arpaio just hours before Breitbart died, that really set off the red flags.

When they realized there were widespread suspicions about an assassination, the people in the media who know about Soros’ threats probably thought they needed to provide protection for the wife and the 4 kids - although they should have known that it would be a dead giveaway if something happened to any of them too. The more the suspicions raged, the more the friends and family wanted to cover everything up. So they came up with stuff geared toward showing that there had been all these problems all along. But if those things had really happened it wouldn’t make sense for Orson Bean, the father-in-law, to have said he didn’t know of any cardiac problems.

It could be that there was a history of heart problems. If so, there should be something from before his death that would corroborate that. Right now it’s all jumbled up because the claims contradict each other.

And it doesn’t help that the media has lied to us about so many things, there are threats to the media, and Obama is trying desperately to hide both what Arpaio’s got and what Breitbart had.

Right now there’s nobody credible in the media, so nobody knows what to believe. The same thing happened after the Bin Laden assassination. No concrete evidence and nobody credible that we could believe. It’s truly a Chicken Little situation, and anybody who hasn’t yet realized how DANGEROUS it is for us to have no credible media has to be brain-dead.