Have seen a lot of speculation right here, about that.
Turns out, Palin can indeed endorse...
I hereby go on record formally endorsing Sarah Palin!
:D
.. DingDing!
Sarah’s smart for not endorsing anyone yet..seems like every few weeks there is a new “Frontrunner” no point in endorsing now. Also, silly question but what is a brokered convention. Ive heard people talk about it just don’t know what it is
she is the only one that will bring out the ENTIRE base along with many independents, especially those in the TEA party
that is why the agents of the left attack her and her family nonstop
My beef with the liberals gay PC whiners at the NYT:
(no, not sure if the author is a homo, just playing averages)
It’s “Mrs.” Palin. Dope.
Nothing like a brokered convention to help the GOP install someone more to their liking.
Palin says, NYT blogs.
Yet, the lamestream media claim she is so irrelevant.
It all depends on ‘who’ gets the nomination at a brokered convention. We all imagine our favorite Republican suddenly being handed the nomination by acclimation. Considering how hard the Republican elites have been pulling for Romney, how much harder would it be for them to rig a real “backroom deal” for their favorite candidate?
Who would be the brokers?
A brokered convention could be the only way someone OTHER than the establishment’s “selectee” (Romney) can become the nominee to run against the most radical president in our lifetimes.
Romney is easily the most liberal of the bunch at the moment, so a coalition of delegates who are conservative, lean conservative and conservative-moderate could have the best hand to defeat the establishment RINOS (after the initial ballot).
You won’t get the “most conservative” in that kind of process, but you would get a “more conservative” candidate than you will without a brokered convention, imo.
Put another way, the establishment GOP has a better chance of getting their way if we DON’T have a brokered convention. Let’s not be afraid of a brokered convention, folks.
Well, that knocks down that one at least — the one where she “endorsed” Newt Gingrich the best she could under her contract.
Now it turns out, She really WAS specifically NOT endorsing Newt when she told people to vote for him. She ACTUALLY MEANT WHAT SHE SAID. I find she does that, and admire her for it.
It never ceases to amaze me how many “Sarah Palin Supporters” spend their time here telling us how she doesn’t really mean what she said, and then they tell us what she REALLY meant. And it always turns out she actually meant what she said.
Nobody wants to be dictated to when it comes to the nominee. That's one of the big problems with this attempted Romney coronation.