Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Erasmus

I used Plus-X on occasion as well - less grainy, obviously, but overall I liked the quality of the prints from my Tri-X shots better. Difficult to explain fully with few words but with the developer (Agfa Rodinal) and paper (Agfa Record Rapid) I used mostly, the best prints I made had a sort of luminosity that just didn’t come out that way with all the other combinations of film, developer (Ilford etc.) and papers (again, Ilford etc.) I used. And then came the PE/RC (plastic based) printing papers which were slightly easier to process but never even got close to the baryta (fiber based) papers in image quality (much less silver content).

Super-Double-X must have been way before my time - never even heard of it, best as I can remember. Kudos to your dad for teaching you lab techniques. I had to go the autodidactic route (not that it’s rocket science...)


33 posted on 02/10/2012 12:57:06 PM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Moltke
You got into the fine points of B&W printing beyond where I got.

I had to go the autodidactic route (not that it’s rocket science...)

It may not be rocket surgery, but it is alchemy.

36 posted on 02/10/2012 1:53:22 PM PST by Erasmus (Able was I ere I saw this crappy little island.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson