Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

But within the recent fossil record?


30 posted on 01/23/2012 11:06:14 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: onedoug
Fossils by definition are not recent and they are not very common. Very few creatures comparatively become fossilized. The larger they are the less likely they are to become fossils.

How long ago they were is kind of tough to tell, we date the fossils by the strata we find them in but we date the strata by the fossils we find in that strata. Which means that any of the fossils found would be assumed to be a certain age because "everybody know" that they died out millions of years ago. See "coelacanth" for an example.

In any case that something like that existed and that there are creatures that have survived mostly unchanged from that era means that it is possible.

60 posted on 01/24/2012 2:05:34 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (In the good times praise His name, In the bad times do the same, In everything give thanks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson