Posted on 01/19/2012 6:23:52 AM PST by Bender2
Given how long CGI has been around, I always thought they'd have improved it by now to the point where it no longer looked like CGI. I was wrong.
Why, with the timing of this movie, you’d almost suspect we had a black Democrat running for re-election.
It looks like a full length version of the History Channel’s “Dogfights”. I wonder if they will portray the Germans as 20 yr. olds with about 40 hrs of flying time? Would they have survived against Hartmann?
“Any movies about the brave men who fought in the Korean War?”
One day I was scrounging around in the bargain video bin at Wal-Mart. I found and bought a Korean War video. It was about artillery spotting aircraft (L17? L19?) My favorite part is where a young impetuous pilot wants to strike back at the enemy. He lashes some bazookas onto the wing strut so he can take out a tank.
The Red Chinese in the movie fly P-51 Mustangs. Can’t remember the title. I’ll have to look it up when I get home.
A few months after Obama usurped the Office, he ordered a terror attack by Air Force One upon downtown Manhattan.
The purpose? Almost certainly it was related to this film.
See comment from "mm" at Althouse blog: May 10, 2009
I saw the trailer for “Red Tails” in the theater, and knowing nothing about the airplanes of the era, I wondered if those types of planes would be capable of the speed and maneuvering depicted in the film.
Other than that, it looked pretty terrible.
Too bad, because those men deserve so much better.
:-)
However, occasionally, Hollywood gets it right.
I was reading about "A Bridge Too Far" (good flick, if you've not seen it). Michael Caine played the Colonel who was leading the initial attack. The scene before the attack had him making this "rah rah, three cheers for the home team, go out and kill some Nazis" chest-thumping type speech to the troops.
Fortunately, the *real* Colonel (Col. J.O.E. Vandeleur) was on set that day, and Caine asked him what he really said before the attack. A plain, straightforward "OK, Let's Go", or somesuch, was the answer. And, that's what made it into the movie.
So, occasionally, Hollywood gets it right. At least, by accident. :-)
Racism did exist in the armed forces; it was part of the background of society at the time, though it probably wasn’t malevolent. I know my uncles, who were all vets (Army Ranger, Merchant Marine, and two Army Air Force), had attitudes running that way when I talked to them after the war. It wasn’t intentional; no one knew different then.
I knew this movie was BS when they had the trailer showing the P-51 Mustangs flying around the B-17s shooting at the Luftwaffe planes. The escort pilots learned quickly that the gunners in the B-17s would shoot at anything so the escorts never went into the actual bomber formations.
The Korean War? You mean the one where they drank Martinis and chased Nurses named Hot Lips?
Dad was in the 25th Tropic Lightning at the Yalu River.
Is it a hollywood movie produced to generate revenue or a documentary?
You have to understand- Lucas is the King of PC. He is also a perpetual 10 year old, mentally, albeit one with billions. The man is pathologically immature and is surrounded by ‘yes’ men . He WON’T grow up and he’s pushing 70. Adult maturity is foreign to him- adult themes are ‘icky’. At least he didn’t WRITE any of this film, did he? If so- it’s doomed.
Oh- Lucas also announced hes retiring from filmmaking. Thank the Maker- hopefully he won’t trash the SW universe anymore!
If my memory serves me correctly, the Tuskegee Airmen started out flying Curtiss P-40 Warhawks...
Then briefly with Bell P-39 Airacobras...
Very briefly with Republic P-47 Thunderbolts...
And finally with North American A-36 Apache (listed in some sources as "Invader") the ground-attack/dive bomber version of the P-51...
And finally with the P-51-D Mustang...
But then again, why quote history... when Hollywood and George Lucas knows best?
I’ll probably wait for the movie to come to Netflix, but the Hollywood Reporter’s issues with historical correctness seem rather nitpicky to me.
There is smoking, but not enough and the wrong kind of smoking? If that is worst historical inaccuracy in the film, it is probably the most accurate film in history.
Nowadays the only thing they teach about WWII is Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden.
What was the conent of the review? I would be interesting in reading it.
What was the conent of the review? I would be interested in reading it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.