In my experience with Administrative Law Hearings, the Judges tend to be generous with who is allowed to testify and submit evidence. Most likely, the Judge will accept any evidence handed to him and reserve a ruling the acceptance of the evidence into the record until after everyone identified in pre-trial motions as a witness has had a chance to testify.
After everyone has had their say and objections have been exhausted, the Judge will unilaterally rule which evidence is admitted and which evidence is denied.
It is important to remind yourself of the issues that will be addressed outlined in the pre-trial Order:
A) Is the candidate’s proffered birth certificates, authentic state-issued documents that verify his actual , physical birth in Hawaii?
B)Is the candidate an Article II natural born citizen of the United States as established in US Supreme Court Case: Minor vs Happersett 1875 Page 88 U.S. 163
C) O.C.G.A. 21-3-560 Making of False Statements Generally. Is the candidate’s Social Security number, authentic?
Any evidence that doesn’t contribute to answering these questions will be rejected by the Judge.
It is important for Plaintiffs to point out the difference between Obama’s original birth record and his COLB he has shown online. Specifically, his original birth record has a “date accepted” with signatures of his mother, hospital administrator and delivery doctor; while his COLB has a “date filed” and no signatures.
The “date filed” on the COLB is indicative of a change, update, modification, or edit after the original birth record was accepted by the Hawai’i DoH. Comparing other Hawai’i COLBs with the corresponding original shows each has a “date accepted” unless there was an update, change, modification or edit after the original was accepted.
The circumstantial evidence Lolo Soetoro adopted Barack Hussein Obama II and naturalized him as an Indonesian National is as follows:
1) The original birth record was sealed and archived as per procedure when an adoption is finalized. The policy a parent cannot renounce the citizenship of a minor was instituted after Obama took office. Anyone, of any age, can move out of the country and renounce their US citizenship.
2) Barry Soetoro, son of Lolo Soetoro and Indonesian Nationals, was enrolled in St. Francis Assisi, Jakarta, Indonesia.
3) The procedure for a US Immigration Customs Enforcement agent who encountered a unaccompanied minor who was not from a border country with the US is to take the child into protective custody and place the child in the Federal Foster care program.
4) Catholic Social Services of Connecticut contracted with the US State Department in 1971 to take custody of unaccompanied minors in the Federal foster care program. It was Catholic Social Services who financed BHO’s Sr. trip from Kenya to Hawai’i in Dec. 1971 to participate in a custody hearing concerning Barry Soetoro, Indonesian National, formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama II. It was at this custody hearing BHO Sr complained he was not informed of his son’s adoption and objected to it. The Soetoro adoption was annulled.
5) Race of father, African, was a politically correct addendum to the new birth record the Hawai’i court ordered due to the annulment of the Soetoro adoption. The Soetoro adoption legally changed who BHO’s II parents where but did not change his Indonesian Nationality.
6) The Court ordered BHO II to remain in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services and appointed Madelyn Payne Dunham as BHO’s II guardian.
7) A Connecticut SSN is indicative of a Permanent Resident Alien, Barack Hussein Obama II, Indonesian National, who was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. A Permanent Resident Alien is identified on the SSA in the “PRA” field of the SSA’s document identification number. BHO’s II “PRA” field is a “Y” indicating “yes” he is a Permanent Resident Alien of the U.S.
8)Five years after he turned 18 years old, BHO II naturalized as an American citizen. His Certificate of Naturalization is on file with the USCIS.
Why not take the statements of HI officials specifically Okubo (it is half hand written and half type written) or Abercrombie (written down in the State archives) and contrast those statements to what Obama released on April 27th.
They just do not jive...
When you say “The “date filed” on the COLB is indicative of a change, update, modification, or edit after the original birth record was accepted....” you’re talking through your hat. There is no authority for such a claim.
The FACT that all the dates on the COLB and the Long form MATCH, proves your remark is nonsense.