When you say “The “date filed” on the COLB is indicative of a change, update, modification, or edit after the original birth record was accepted....” you’re talking through your hat. There is no authority for such a claim.
The FACT that all the dates on the COLB and the Long form MATCH, proves your remark is nonsense.
The “date filed” field data is backdated to the “date accepted” to ensure privacy as to the matter of a correction, update, edit or change.
The only clue a correction, update, edit or change has taken place in the birth records is the “date accepted” and “date filed” have been changed. Obots have erroneously maintained the date Aug 8, 1961 has remained unchanged in the original birth record and the COLB, yet there is no image data available on the net where there is a “date accepted” with a date and “date filed” with a different date.
For clarity:
If there haven’t been any changes, edits, corrections or updates to the birth record in Hawai’i, then the Original LFBC will have “date accepted” and the COLB will have a “date accepted” with the same date.
If there has been a change, edit, correction or update to the birth record in Hawai’i, then the Original LFBC will have a “date accepted” and the COLB will have a “date filed” with the same date.