If Hawaii refuses to cooperate with State judges, the State judges should claim Obama is not eligible for the elections in their States because he has failed to provide the documentation needed by the court to be certified for the ballots. Everyone can play this game.
It’s time to check mate the Muslim and his criminal abettors at the GOP and DNC. Either he demonstrates he is constitutionally qualified to be the President in cooperation with the courts, or he does not and is therefore rule ineligble.
The same would happen to any of us if we refused to provide the documentation needed to establish our citizenship and residency. Fork over the documentation or move along.
Quite correct. It is amazing this point is not widely recognized, but it very well may be the theory behind plaintiff's action before the GA court, notwithstanding its troubling assertion birthplace is irrelevant.
There should be no argument that it is naturally incumbent on every state to require evidence supporting a Certificate of Eligibility in order to appear on the ballot.
In this case, in order to avoid legal delays over any possible conflict with privacy laws which may be raised by HI, perhaps the GA court should also request all candidate(s) provide a copy of the BC in support of the oath. Ignoring or refusing such request would seem alone sufficient basis for denying a place on the ballot.
It seems inconceivable that a federal court could find any basis to deny a state the means of validating a certificate given to it under oath for a state process.