Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wideminded
It seems like there are thousands and thousands of counterexamples to this very dogmatic statement.

Every language that uses the alphabet (or any variation thereof) is a phonetic language. The fact that nearly all phonetic languages have absorbed words from other languages doesn't negate that.

The fact that you can also somehow learn to read English through the whole word sight reading method also doesn't negate the fact that it's a phonetic language.

62 posted on 12/17/2011 8:15:50 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
Apparently you have your own personal definition of "phonetic".

I don't have a stake in the argument over the best way to learn how to read since I have only vaguely learned what all this is about, mainly from seeing threads like this on FR. It is quite possible that you are correct that emphasis on sight words is bad when one is learning to read. Nevertheless, it is clear that English is not an entirely phonetic language. If it were, all these words would end with the same sound:

bough
cough
dough

And they wouldn't be spelled in this absurd fashion.

64 posted on 12/17/2011 10:26:46 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson