To: Liberty1970
"I know what hes got in the reactor, I know everything. It was a spectroscopy (Greek: fasmatoscopy) made by the university of Siena. It was an equipment made by the University of Siena. It understands everything thats inside the reactor. So we know the components. "AS A PHYSICIST, I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS STATEMENT MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL- IT IS SCIENTIFIC-SOUNDING GOBBLEDYGOOK
4 posted on
11/29/2011 9:11:25 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to proofreed <--- oops, see?)
To: Mr. K
No need to shout. Keep in mind a lot of this is translated, sometimes multiple times (i.e., Italian to Swedish to English and so on.)
If you are a physicist you should know perfectly well that you can analyze the elements present in an object through spectroscopy. So please explain what's wrong with this report.
5 posted on
11/29/2011 9:17:55 AM PST by
Liberty1970
(Skepticism and Close-mindedness are two very different things.)
To: Mr. K
I think it’s coming across as gobbledygook because it got mangled in translation. My guess is that he’s trying to say that the University folks took samples from within a reactor and conducted some form of spectroscopy on them which allowed them to identify the mysterious catalyst that Rossi uses to make his E-CAT function.
Unless they give more proof that this thing actually works, my guess is that they used moonbeam spectroscopy to identify the catalyst as rainbows, fairy dust, and ground up Keebler elves.
6 posted on
11/29/2011 9:18:02 AM PST by
verum ago
(A liberal's mind is like a single action revolver with a bobbed hammer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson