You even help them rationalize Cain's “motivations” behind these baseless accusations.
Axelrod owes you some big bucks FRiend.
As I said, Cain’s devotees would stick with him no matter how much proof was presented...as for non-devotees, a fair amount of proof actually has been presented. Cain is the one who has offered no substantial proof that these things didn’t happen (i.e., that he was elsewhere at the time, that he was with someone at the time, etc.) and has even lied about the documented events (the employment settlements).
Now I see people here rationalizing it and even say, well, hey, so what’s wrong if he gets a little on the side every now and then. What red-blooded guy doesn’t? This overlooks issues like abuse of power, abuse of trust, and basic honesty. Cain is a Baptist minister, after all, so he should supposedly know better.
Remember, as with Clinton, it’s not about the sex, it’s about the lying. And Cain has certainly been doing a lot of that. Frankly, I’d suspect he never even mentioned the mistress to the expensive attorney he bought to attack the other women. Even the attorney sounded a little non-plussed.