See, here is where people get embarrassed, when you had no idea what my actual position was, but rather went according to your friend SonofRegan’s off color comment to me.
“It’s pretty clear, with a week’s hindsight, and further developments, that whatever Cain did, it wasn’t actually sexual harassment; nor does he appear to have any hidden history of sexual harassment.”
Ahhh, point to one instance when I insinuated that Cain was guilty of such? You can’t because it never happened. You also accused me of bashing Cain, which I did not ever do, nor have I ever insulted any of his fans.
I stated that it didn’t appear that there was EVER much to whatever slight allegations had been made against Cain 12 years ago. Thus, I didn’t see how such complaints could “destroy” him. Go back and read the posts. Read any post I’ve every written, I’ve never slammed Cain. The most I’ve said is that I wish he had a prepared answer, since he knew this was coming. I know, terrible of me wasn’t it?
When you read things out of order, and then take stuff out of context...........
Which is what you did. As did SoR, and you both insulted me for your lack of understanding what I actually had said.
Where on earth did you get the impression that I was trying to “pile on Cain”? ????? Point to one single thing I have written that suggests so. Please do.
I HAD been having a reasoned discussion on a discussion board, and I have no idea how you think this sort of thing;
“If the former, why *don’t* you go deal with real harassment and worse taking place in the current day, rather than vague non-sourced allegations of non-harassment years ago?”
is at all relevant. The topic WAS on those very same “vague non-sourced” allegations, which IS WHY I WAS COMMENTING ON THEM. It was not in the least about OWS, or any current charges of misconduct anywhere.
Nor was it about Clinton.
Cheers!