Posted on 11/04/2011 10:30:36 AM PDT by Raebie
A Dilbert cartoon. Explains much, LOL! You are HILARIOUS. Meanwhile, I am sure you are quite busy at the cellular level.
KNOCK IT OFF!
Sure, it would have been nice if he hadn’t made a random personal attack on me first. Out of the blue. I suppose this sort of thing is OK with you?
“Since you appear to be so concerned with womyn being sexually harassed, mayhap you should stroll on over to the OWS protests where they are pitching a tent (literally) for the ladies, ironically enough to protect them from other men who are also pitching a tent (colloquially) for the ladies.
Perhaps you would be able to talk sense into the marauders.”
Post 120
Oh, I must apologize, I though it was grey-whiskers that pushed the button for your help, but on looking back I see it was SonofRegan.
If you get a few moments you should read though his comments to me, which were off topic, erupted out of nowhere, and attempts at personal insults, and perhaps you will understand the replies I made.
Cheers!
Oh, and this gem,
“It must be so hard to be so desired by men. Get conceited much? Ha ha...another failure in life and love pretending it doesn’t matter. You screwed up sister, no one wants you now. It’s over for you.”
Not an attempt at a personal attack at all? No no no. And completely on topic.
So, we are not allowed to respond to such in kind? It would appear not.
Are you really concerned with harassment, or are you just trying to pile on Cain?
If the latter, who is your favored candidate?
If the former, why *don't* you go deal with real harassment and worse taking place in the current day, rather than vague non-sourced allegations of non-harassment years ago?
No piling on: just asking for logical consistency in your attitudes and postings and your actions.
BTW, would you care to recap what it was you posted in #136 (now pulled) for which I dropped a dime on you?
And ask the Mod -- I only referenced *that one post* and asked that it be removed.
Which appears to be all that happened in response.
Cheers!
See, here is where people get embarrassed, when you had no idea what my actual position was, but rather went according to your friend SonofRegan’s off color comment to me.
“It’s pretty clear, with a week’s hindsight, and further developments, that whatever Cain did, it wasn’t actually sexual harassment; nor does he appear to have any hidden history of sexual harassment.”
Ahhh, point to one instance when I insinuated that Cain was guilty of such? You can’t because it never happened. You also accused me of bashing Cain, which I did not ever do, nor have I ever insulted any of his fans.
I stated that it didn’t appear that there was EVER much to whatever slight allegations had been made against Cain 12 years ago. Thus, I didn’t see how such complaints could “destroy” him. Go back and read the posts. Read any post I’ve every written, I’ve never slammed Cain. The most I’ve said is that I wish he had a prepared answer, since he knew this was coming. I know, terrible of me wasn’t it?
When you read things out of order, and then take stuff out of context...........
Which is what you did. As did SoR, and you both insulted me for your lack of understanding what I actually had said.
Where on earth did you get the impression that I was trying to “pile on Cain”? ????? Point to one single thing I have written that suggests so. Please do.
I HAD been having a reasoned discussion on a discussion board, and I have no idea how you think this sort of thing;
“If the former, why *don’t* you go deal with real harassment and worse taking place in the current day, rather than vague non-sourced allegations of non-harassment years ago?”
is at all relevant. The topic WAS on those very same “vague non-sourced” allegations, which IS WHY I WAS COMMENTING ON THEM. It was not in the least about OWS, or any current charges of misconduct anywhere.
Nor was it about Clinton.
Cheers!
Try reading the source comment first if you are feeling inclined to be condensing or insulting. You may have realized that SoR jumped the gun also, and was just reacting to his own misinterpretation of the comment I had made, which was one in a series of ongoing discussion with CaptainKirk.
I took offense to his (SoR) nonsense, as he intended I should. It was why he phrased the comments the way that he did. Then he pushed the button for help because he didn’t enjoy being responded to in kind.
That would be “condescending”, rather than “condensing”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.