Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/12/2011 6:12:00 AM PDT by kdun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: kdun

I have been impressed with what Newt has said he would do if elected. When he was Speaker, his first 100 days and the “Contract with America” was great. Problem is, IMHO, it all went down hill from there. He had Republican majorities but let the Democrats walk all over him. They called the shots, not Newt. Did he learn his lesson? Would he roll over for the liberals once in the White House? I don’t know.

We need someone who will be just as brutal and persistant for the conservative agenda (read -Tea Party) as these Marxist are who control our country now.

As many have already said, we will not find the perfect conservative to run. Everyone will have their faults and weaknesses. For me, the question is “Will they overturn the Obama/Marxist/socialist/communist agenda that has been put into effect and return us to Constutional government?”


30 posted on 10/12/2011 6:39:29 AM PDT by A. Patriot (Have we lost our Republic? Do the majority of Americans care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
I'm with you: Newt may not be perfect but he is far and away the best leader in the bunch.

We need a leader, not just somebody who looks good and might beat Obama.

The new guy will have to rebuild our government from the ground up and Newt's the guy to do it.

32 posted on 10/12/2011 6:44:31 AM PDT by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

I like to listen to Newt, but I can’t seriously consider him for president or vice-president. He’s too unpredictable and, sometimes, full of himself.


33 posted on 10/12/2011 6:46:05 AM PDT by BfloGuy (Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

I too am leaning toward Newt. I think a Newt/Cain ticket will be the best ticket. Newt knows the system better than any candidate up there. Cain is a savy business man and he connects with the people. They can beat Obama and I think republicans, conservatives and libertarians will rally around them.


36 posted on 10/12/2011 6:51:50 AM PDT by katwoman5779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Newt is a good debater, but that’s about it.

How soon some forget just a couple months ago Newt was busy throwing virtually every House Republican under the bus by calling Ryan’s budget “right wing social engineering” because it actually dealt with reigning in Medicare.

And have we already forgotten Newt posing on that couch with Pelosi to combat the complete fraud that is global warming.

And sorry, Newt’s wife is just scary and his Newt’s personal life is a train wreck that would dominate the news were he nominated.

I enjoy listening to Newt debate, but he is not a leader and not presidential material.


37 posted on 10/12/2011 6:52:54 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

No. No. No. How’s that?


39 posted on 10/12/2011 6:54:29 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

I love Newt but the answer is two words:

baggage
electability

My prayer is that someone should emerge who is reasonably conservative, able to articulate conservative principles even if he/she is not ideologically perfect who is also electable. As crass as it is, this means someone without “baggage”, someone reasonably telegenic, reasonably articulate, personable, likeable. As much as we might love Newt’s intellect and his ability to articulate conservative principles, I think he loses out on the baggage/electability criterion.

If only we could put Newt’s brain into Perry’s or Romney’s body and persona....

Don’t get me wrong, as much as Romney has that “electability” factor, his flip-floppiness, his somewhat plastic quality, his starkly liberal policy history and, specifically, RomneyCare, all make me a little sick at the thought of supporting him. If he’s the nominee, though, I think he has a good chance of beating Obama and that’s what matters to me most.

Candidly, I am shocked by the number of people on FR who are saying they won’t vote for Romney under any circumstances including the general election. How could anyone think of having the present America-killing marxist in the White House for another 4 years? 4 years that he won’t even care about getting re-elected? It chills me to the bone to think of what he might do, given how outrageous he has been while facing re-election.


41 posted on 10/12/2011 6:58:14 AM PDT by JewishRighter ( Multiculturalism is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Yes, Newt is very intelligent, understands the problems, is well spoken, I think he would make a good president.

On an unrelated note however, have you ever seen so many bowties as we’ve seen this week on television? What is it with elections and bowties, it’s like there’s these reporters that crawl out during the election cycles only and they wear bowties ...


42 posted on 10/12/2011 6:58:30 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Newt....Nah!

The Contract With America was brilliant but Clinton played him afterward, big time.

The Nancy Pelosi couch.

His propensity to court a new wife when he still has a wife (occasionally said wife is suffering from cancer.)

He dissed the Ryan Plan.

There are many, many other but those are the biggies for me.

But if Newt secures the nomination, I will wholeheartedly support him. A.B.O!!


43 posted on 10/12/2011 6:58:51 AM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
Newt is a superb idea man and a splendid debater. He needs to be in a basement somewhere cranking out great ideas and writing great policy statements.

He was a has been before his zipper-control problems even surfaced. He let Clinton coast to reelection by running against him (not the cardboard cutout of Bob Dole) in 1996. Then he let Hillary coast to election in New York in 2000 by doing essentially the same thing.

He is great on stage against Republicans, some of them who richly deserve to be eviscerated. But put him on stage against Democrats and his natural instinct is to do the kissy-faced couch commercial like he did with Nancy Pelosi.

44 posted on 10/12/2011 6:59:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
Newt does great in the debates but the thing that bugs me about him is the way he demonized the Ryan budgetary plan. its one thing to say you disagree with aspects of it but he just gave the DNC ammo by condemning it with harsh language. oh and this doesnt help him either:
45 posted on 10/12/2011 7:00:46 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Newt is one of the largest symptoms of the problem We the People out in Flyover Country have with DC...


46 posted on 10/12/2011 7:02:23 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
What Mr. Raines failed to mention was that, all along, Fannie and Freddie were spending millions on lobbying to ensure that regulators did not get in their way. As the AP reported Sunday night, Freddie spent $11.7 million in lobbying in 2006 alone, with Newt Gingrich, for example, getting $300,000 that year for talking up the benefits of Freddie's business model. (Apologies welcome, Newt.)

Other Republicans on Freddie's payroll included former Senator Al D'Amato and Congressman Vin Weber, and then House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's former chief of staff, Susan Hirschmann. As we know by now, Fan and Fred tried to buy everybody in town from both political parties, and the companies did it well enough to make themselves immune from regulatory scrutiny.

Almost everybody that was in Washington in the last 20 years played a role in the current economic meltdown - including Newt. Solutions that come from people that didn't participate in the problem in the first place have more credibility.

47 posted on 10/12/2011 7:02:48 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Newt is fantastic. He sorts out the chaff and presents sterling wheat. Too bad he has such negatives and can’t possibly be our nominee.


48 posted on 10/12/2011 7:08:28 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Newt is the most brilliant of all of them, but I fear he is too polarizing to be elected. Whoever wins the nom and becomes president would do well to put him in a high position. I always thought he would make an excellent Secretary of State or even Defense.


53 posted on 10/12/2011 7:21:33 AM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

In a debate with Newt Obama would respond with “present”.


54 posted on 10/12/2011 7:21:42 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

Cain and Newt seem to have a bond, I think they should ‘Team Up’ now, combine there resources, and sweep the Nation Clean.


56 posted on 10/12/2011 7:28:50 AM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
I think a Cain/Gingrich (in that order) ticket would be devastating to Dems. The are both smarter and better debaters than the incumbents, and they complement each other very well.

I think Gingrich has too much baggage to be at the top of the ticket, but he would make an awesome VP.

I don't think any of the candidates are perfect, but of the candidates, these two are my favorites.

57 posted on 10/12/2011 7:30:47 AM PDT by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun
Not just "no", not even "NO!", but "Oh, HELL NO!"

Your research must be flawed, or non-existant.

60 posted on 10/12/2011 7:36:02 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kdun

yes, but...

remember after the inauguration and rush said he hoped that obama’s policies failed?

newt agreed.

until the democrats demanded that he apologize.

so, newt apologized.


62 posted on 10/12/2011 7:39:16 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson