Posted on 10/05/2011 9:35:01 PM PDT by dangus
1. Perry refused to allow Hispanics to be educated in English, and preferring Mexico-supplied history books which inculcate them with a hatred of America.
2. Perry violated the spirit and letter of conservative-supported federal law which prohibits giving illegal aliens preference over American students in state-run tuition breaks.
3. Perry subverts conservative-supported federal law, by interfering with the construction of the border fence. The law is that it must be built. Incredibly, he claims the reason he opposes it isn't because of his zealous crusade to flood the American job market with cheap labor, but on the grounds that violates private property. But...
4. Perry Initiated on the most massive state campaign to subvert private property by abusing eminent domain to try to build a superhighway allowing Mexican truckers and coyotes access to America’s heartland, while denying access to this highway by actual Americans
5. Perry opposes the implementation of E-Verify, and feeding his Perrytards with lies and disinformation against E-Verify. Despite years of searching, liberals have yet to find the American who lost his job because of E-Verify. Contrary to Perrytards’ lies, E-Verify does NOT create any new databases, stores, or even associations for any worker, but merely allows employers to check existing social-security data.
Pure crap, but you know that.
Can’t refute a word I wrote, can you?
I can’t go with Cain either. Not after his race card antics.
It makes perfect sense to this heartless conservative. Frankly, I am shocked . . . shocked I tell you, that he has any supporters on a site such as Free Republic. But then, so does Ron Paul - who is even crazier.
What is a Perrytard?
Do you really think European style socialized medicine would be better than just turning America into a Mexican style sh*thole? < / sarcasm >
Sorry about some of the bad grammar. I took what I wrote in a thread, and changed it from “Perry betrayed America by...” But I didn’t catch all the necessary changes in verb tense, capitalization, etc.
They both are a joke.
Say it slowly to yourself.
Say it slowly to yourself. (It’s like an Obamabot, but it claims to be a Republican.)
Yeah, the context was that I was willing to scrape the bottom to vote for anyone but the Gore Groupie.
For a second there, I thought this was a serious thread.
Got any proof or sources on any of this?
Not to mention, I find it rather ironic that in two of your points, your arguing in favor of federal laws and regulations against what the local government and legislature decided was in their state’s best interest. You may not agree with what they decided, but saying that they don’t have that right in the first place? Seems like a rather odd stance to take.
I don’t have any compunction about pointing out that a “Republican” is really a disguised liberal. What kind of a drooling idiot would say, “He’s right. Perry is too much like Obama. I’m going to vote for Obama instead.”? In that way, you’d have to be a god-damned fool to worry about circular firing squads.
It's a silly term invented by pro-Perry agents provocateur to discredit opposition to Perry by associating such opposition with the pathetic use of idiotic neologism.
“1. Perry refused to allow Hispanics to be educated in English, and preferring Mexico-supplied history books which inculcate them with a hatred of America. “
Romney is going to have a field day with Texas educational standards. MA was ranked #1 in the country while Texas has some of the worst performing schools.
No, actually when it comes to matters of protecting the rights of American citizens and defending America’s borders, the states do NOT have the right to subvert, undermine or violate federal law. God knows we need to resurrect the 10th amendment, and limit the commerce clause to regulations directly related to commerce. But defending our borders and protecting the rights of Americans against law-breaking foreigners being given preferential treatment are absolutely within the federal purview.
And that’s one of the issues where Perry reveals himself to be a sloganeering idiot. State’s rights are a protection of the people against an overzealous, intrusive federal government. But Perry uses the phrase the way neoconfederates do, as if government has the right to trample on the liberty of the people, so long as it’s the state government and not the federal government, as made clear by the Gardasil corruption, the Texas Corridor highway, and many other issues.
What about Paultard? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.