“You seem to be refusing to answer the questions [...]”
Yes, obviously I am denigrating your questions as so blatantly misrepresentative of what the courts actually held that attempting to answer your fantasies would be futile.
If you are unable to figure out whether, as you asked, Twitter has the authority to decide court cases, that’s your own failure. The position I’ve taken is if birthers can’t figure out even that much, well, so much for the birthers.
You, butterdezillion, introduced this question as some kind of indictment of our courts. O.K., if a court actually held that Twitter has the authority to decide court cases, as you suggested/implied, then then I’d at least have to take it seriously enough to answer.
So go for it. You raised the issue. If you cite and quote a U.S. court saying that Twitter has the authority to decide court cases, as you had presented, then I’d be in a tough spot. The advantage I have is that I’ve made a hobby of studying crank theories, and I’m pretty sure I know the court decision that you misrepresenting.
You are a tiresome drone, BladeBryan. Of course I know whether Twitter has the authority to decide court cases. It is you who will not answer that question and a couple other easy math cases, such as “Is 20,000 greater than 500?” and “Does the year 1967 come before the year 1978?” These are easy questions; you still won’t answer them. Either poop, or get off the potty.