Differences Standing and Failure to State A Claim
I will still try to get Fabia to explain it tomorrow when I help her type and put together her brief.
Sigh. You are wasting my time. Did you even read the page you sent me to?
According to that page, standing depends on jurisdiction and redressability, so the two ways a judge basically denies standing is to say that either they lack jurisdiction or that the claimant has failed to state a redressable claim.
After a claim is filed the defendant can move to have the motion dismissed, and that is often when the judge dismisses the case for lack of standing - either because they claim to have no jurisdiction over the case or they claim it is not redresseable (because either there was no specific and real injury, the injury was not specifically caused by what is asked to be remedied, or there is no legal remedy to give redress).
That’s exactly what happened in the case you’re talking about, and I strongly suspect that your “Fabia” is either as imaginary as the boogie man or else dumb as rocks. I also strongly suspect that you are either around 11 years old (which is how old my daughter is, and she talks about this or that “thingy” as well) or else you are a troll just trying to waste all of our time while frustrating the heck out of us.
My life is too short and I have too many important things to do, to get caught up in a debate with an 11-year-old and his/her imaginary lawyer friend.
The site you gave me the link for doesn’t have the Indiana case listed, that I could see.