[Robert A Cook PE]

Whew! I’m sure glad you abbreviated that presentation. My head was starting to hurt following all the large number calculations (I don’t like adding and subtracting co’s).

Oh man! And here I was hopin’ you were gonna get all impressed with mah technical know-how! 8<)

(If I did all those equations again for the next 200 common isotopes, would it be any more clear??? We could throw in radioactive decay times and probabilities for all them there nuclear reactions and times for the supernova generations to burn up stars .....Get into Einstein's relativistic accelerations as the particles speed away from the supernova ...)

[grey_whiskers]

Don't forget branching ratios for formation of, and decay series for the actinides.

Cheers!

[MHGinTN]

See, I've been asseerting for a decade now that the early universe had a much smaller volume of time, thus the processes we assume in our much larger volume of time occurred in a much smaller volume of time and space ... how big a volume of spacetime existed at 100,000,000 years after the bang?

When Feynman said there is a lot of room 'down' we might also apply that to back in temporal volume. We have a lot of temporal volume now, but in the early universe there was 'not so much'. I'm the crazyman who asserts that time has three variable expressions, similar to dimension space (linear-past; planar-present; volume-future and all past and present as a unit; from The Creator's perspective, all of variable expressions of time are occurring simultaneously).