Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Tom Paine; SunkenCiv

I agree with your hypothesis. After all, they trained from childhood in this armor and reputedly some were trained to leap to the saddle in full armor (probably not the armor we see in jousts in the movies).

Another comment along this line. Look at some of the surviving weapons such as battle axes, maces and broadswords. They were huge and made out of steel and had to be a bitch to swing all day in battle, but they did—while wearing mail and carrying shields.

Tough knights don’t dance.


47 posted on 08/27/2011 9:47:11 AM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: wildbill; Citizen Tom Paine

Even by 1066, the swords were long and heavy in order to penetrate the armor of that time — also the impact could break limbs, rupture blood vessels, or knock an opponent cold, irrespective of the amount of armor.


48 posted on 08/27/2011 10:15:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson