Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wildbill; Citizen Tom Paine

Even by 1066, the swords were long and heavy in order to penetrate the armor of that time — also the impact could break limbs, rupture blood vessels, or knock an opponent cold, irrespective of the amount of armor.


48 posted on 08/27/2011 10:15:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Consider the Scottish Claymore:

The last known battle in which it is considered to have been used in a significant number was the Battle of Killiecrankie in 1689.[You gotta love that name for a battle]

It was somewhat smaller than other two-handed swords of the era. The average claymore ran about 140 cm (55 in) in overall length, with a 33 cm (13 in) grip, 107 cm (42 in) blade, and a weight of approximately 5.5 lb (2.5 kg).[citation needed]

Try swinging that all day.


72 posted on 08/28/2011 8:16:23 AM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson