He would still have to be bizzy at 9 to impregnate enough womman so half of Europe are descended from him.
The article didn’t say that 50 per cent of European men were descended from King Tut. It said that they share a common ancestor with King Tut.
"Share DNA" does not equal "prodigy of". In any event, he could have had one child and that line could have then been prolific.
Mathmatically, genetic mixing occurs faster and more broadly that you might imagine possible.
No, his father, grandfather and great grandfather must have been awesome warriors. King Tut, just happens to be the famous son...
Rape, pillage and plunder was the order of the day.