Posted on 07/23/2011 8:47:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Anders Behring Breivik accused of gunning down 85 people at a youth camp and killing another seven in a bomb attack regularly poster on several Norwegian Internet sites, notably the blog document.no, which is run by Hans Rustad, a former left wing journalist. Breivik's whole shtick seems to be against the combination of multiculturalism and Islam which he sees as destructive to the Norway culture and Europe as a whole. While Breivik is anti-Muslim immigration from his postings and manifesto, he appears to be at least not against Muslim people as a whole but against 'political Islam'....He appears to be all over the map politically and ideology
Here is the original document.no postings of Breivik
Here is the English translations
Some posts out of over a 1000:
Posted on 2009-09-14 10:57:20 as a reaction to post by 'Caper'
Caper,
I didn't see that the EDL as it is today is what we would have wanted. But it is essential that the intellectual conservative forces (unofficially) offer political and ideological schooling to our youth between 15 and 25. Who else is to do that?
We cannot despise the young in society and refuse to come closer to them only because they lack ideological training, since it is exactly OUR (culturally conservative intellectuals) responsibility to do so.
Bawer [homosexual anti-islamist Bruce Bawer] is probably not the right person to work as a bridge builder. He is a liberal anti-Jihadist, and in many ways not a culturally conservative. I have my suspicions about him being TOO paranoid [with reference to his homosexuality). It could seem as though he fears that 'cultural conservatives' will become a threat against homosexuals in the future. Therefore he refuses to take his chance to influence them into a positive direction? That seems completely irrational.
It has to be said that many organizations such as VB [Flemish nationalist party Vlaams Belang] needs to go through many 'reforms', before they reach our level.
Anyway, we are not in a position where we can pick and choose our partners. That's why we have to ensure that we influence other culturally conservatives to take our anti-racist pro-homosexual, pro-Israeli line of thought. When this direction has been taken we can take it to the next level.
The consolidation MUST continue, and people must contribute by influencing (in stead of isolating).
------------------------------------------------
post 68
For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differ. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies. Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazi might, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to enter a club, be conservative, etc.
------------------------------------------------
Post 85
I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant retoriker and communicator, one of the best we've seen over the past 30 years
-----------------------------------------------------
Post 87
But firstly, we can not and should not compare the cultural struggle in the U.S. with that in Europe. Rhetoric must and should be different. The average "right click" - Republican in the U.S. is a "libertarian" (anti-socialist but pro multikulti) while the average conservative in Europe is much more anti-multikulti but arguments based on cultural resistance against Islamization.
Post 89
The so-called anti-multiculti in the U.S. based their rhetoric on ethnocentrism alone which thus differs greatly from Europeans. This is the main reason that we must separate the American and European cultural struggle. I usually stay away from American issues as a result.
---------------------------------------------------
Post 307
I strongly doubt that your theory is correct. The whole conflict between GDP and EDL started with a change of leadership in the EDL for a few months ago. They threw out the racist and denounced the BNP. They chose instead SIOE's ideological basis that is more or less mainstream view on the right side in Western Europe now (Vienna School of Thought).
------------------------------------------------
post 335
Ethnocentric movements that BNP, National Front is not successful and will never be able to get over 10% support (GDP 5%, the UN has 7%). One can not fight racism (multikulti) with racism. Ethnocentrism is therefore the complete opposite of what we want to achieve.
-------------------------------------------------
post 443
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist youth culture conservative options. Some people choose the options that exist, that it is ethnocentric.
------------------------------------------------
Post 775
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
Post 777
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
--------------------------------------------------------
Post 233
I have never understood why the West focus so disproportionately on Iran and so little on the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, which after all is the most dangerous and most powerful Muslim central power. We should, of course, as soon as the bombing suspect their facilities but otherwise focus much more on Saudi. Could it be something that Iran is not a major oil exporter?
European “conservatives” also tend to resemble what we’d label democrats. The so-called “far-right” in Europe, are often bands of thuggish “nationalists” who are extremely anti-capitalist. Somehow the idea that “patriotic aka nationalistic” has stuck as a catch all for right wing. Probably because the Marxists were “internationalists.” It’s unfortunate, because I wouldn’t throw groups who are protecting their countries own national interests in with the nut jobs, but so we have it.... if you aren’t multi-culti you’re a fascist. (sarcasm)
19 posted on Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:36:01 PM by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2752869/posts
According to Swedish website Expo Anders Behring Breivik is a member of ‘Nordisk’ which has 22,000 members and focuses on political terrorism.
was a member of a Swedish nazi forum which encourages attacks on government buildings.
The Norwegian daily Verdens Gang QOUTED A FRIEND as saying Breivik became a right-wing extremist
Often, the extremes in Europe are communists on the left and fascists on the right.
So, an “extreme right wing” individual in Europe is not always an “extreme right wing” individual in America. That’s important to note
So he belongs to the swedish nazi party that believes in attacks on government buildings , sounds like adolph obammas best friend bill ayers.
2 posted on Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:11:48 PM by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2752864/posts
TWO EXAMPLES I found so far.
Proof positive that the guy is nuts.
“Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.”
Apparently the part about killing innocent people wasn’t such a problem for him, either. His problem is that they aren’t blond and blue eyed.
An isolationist, he wants Norway to be Norway. Norwegian people, values, culture not some muddled, middling, multicultural Marxist and Islamic state which he sees the EU becoming.
He finds Marxism has crowded out national identity in education and the press with opposition belittled, dismissed or attacked. He finds high risk in a Marxist-led European Union believing it would follow other failed states before it like the Soviet Union in killing millions or follow the bloodshed that has come with prior invasions from Islamic radicals over the centuries.
Along with the Marxists, he takes issue with the Nazis and pre-enlightenment Christendom as blood-shedding imperialists.
This isn't about ideology or racial supremacy but national identity.
Even after the video, I can't see the connection between the attacks and his goals. How are they a means to further his cause rather than cutting the legs out from under it and playing into the very Marxist propagandist hands he fears.
“Why is he regarded as a right-winger?”
Because he is a white male who believed in God (his own definition of God).
thanks Bigtigermike. Related sidebar:
Norway Shooter’s 1500 Page Manifesto
MyPetJawa | 7/23/11
Posted on 07/23/2011 8:52:22 PM PDT by SanFranDan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2753026/posts
Proof positive that the guy is nuts.”
You are so right.
He praised Obama’s communication skills, not Obama’s politics. Is Obama a bad orator?
Never heard of a conservative with a manifesto.
He believes he just started the clock on the 70 year revolution. He thinks this will inspire more attacks, an underground, a movement. He plans on becoming the leader of a political movement from prison.
My reading so far is that he's given up on the political system as a rigged game and concluded that violence was the "only logical option" (his words) at this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.