Did you see last night’s interview? I caught it. I was fascinated by the foreman’s claim that he “encouraged” the other jurors NOT to go before the cameras immediately after the verdict because they were sobbing and emotional....many do believe Casey is guilty........my conclusion: many were coerced into this verdict and he didn’t want it to all come out like that.....HE prefers to be the “spokesman” for the jury and get his side out in front first and foremost. This guy sounds like a master manipulator much the same as Casey.
He will have to get out of the way of that blond Goldilocks juror or sit on her. She is out everyday pounding the sand so to speak on TV espousing her views of there is no evidence.
I wonder if she knows she just got the moron of the year award for the jury that least listened to evidence presented in a murder case?
Her latest venture in TV land consisted of they had no evidence while the rest of her explanation related to how stupid the public is for disagreeing with their verdict. Oddly her explanation sounded more like an agenda getting rid of the death penalty than a true and through deliberation of the evidence presented to this jury.
Thanks for filling me in on Greta’s 2 part interview with the jury foreman. Due to work constraints I was unable to watch it and I never thought to record it. This foreman does sound like he had a lot of influence on the jurors. I still wonder if Juror #6 (the guy who had a TV cooking show in San Francisco) didn’t give the jurors a lot of ideas about how to hold out for more money, too.