Casey Anthony juror, 60, quits work and flees town in fear of her life

Daily Mail Reporter ^ | 7/11/11 | Daily Mail Reporter

[Texas Eagle]

Maybe Casey can think of a good hiding place for her.

[commonguymd]

When jurors make money writing books and value their decisions on monetary reward, yes it is broken to some degree. People get convicted rightfully so with very little evidence, yet this case had mountains if you in fact followed it. A non-guilty verdict is likely going to be more valuable to the jurors that want to speak out and write books. That is the sad part of this whole affair. Blame the media that rewards bad behavior. The parents apparently have signed a 2 million dollar deal to profit off the death, of which they have profited enormously from already. The perjury on the stand knowing where the profit was is sad.

[saminfl]

...lets make sure that people going for jury duty know well ahead that if they come back with a verdict that the mob doesn’t like, their lives are in danger.

I am under the impression that you consider yourself the absolute authority on the verdict. What about people who watched the entire trial, saw all the evidence presented and came to a different conclusion than yours? To say those people who were angry because the felt the jury didn't do there job is an insult. You and others who call people who disagree with the verdict a mob act like pompous asses.

[mom4melody]

Then I guess the same can be said for all the “Voters” that voted for Obama.

We shouldn’t be second guessing and mocking their decision either.

Just doing their civic duty, right?

[waxer1]

I may have to accept the jury verdict but I dont have to respect it. I saw the same evidence they did. they only took 10 hours to go over the testamony? no guily on on counts. Prosecutors did not overreach. They could have come back with manslaughter.

They were just plain lazy and wanted to go home. They are just going to have to live with the critisim.

[Smokin' Joe]

People need to get a grip

I agree. The media keep pumping this like there is no end, and there's plenty more they can be reporting on. In the meantime, they have the whole country second guessing their votes.

Enough is enough.

[mad_as_he$$]

lol...Making friends this early I see!!

[commonguymd]

It’s easy to jump on a wagon when the wagon finally stopped and play devil’s advocate for fun and sanctimonious glee - when you haven’t followed the case or studied the evidence, the mountains of evidence. Methinks, part of the problem is they watch the 30 minute crime shows where everything is tidy and wrapped up quickly.

[Past Your Eyes]

I think you’re on to something there. I’ve been on a couple juries and there’s no way that case with weeks of testimony in the courtroom should have been decided with so little deliberation. Slam, Dunk, Let’s get outta here.

[poobear]

She’s shopping for the “right” interview.

[driftdiver]

To threaten and wish harm upon the jury is Frankenstein like mob behavior and has no place in a civilized country.

How many people throwing insults and condemnation have ever served on a jury? Most likely the people like you did everything they could to get out of serving.

[Dr. Scarpetta]

Ping

[kidd]

I think I agree with you

[JimRed]

Drama queen, or has she had actual threats?

[driftdiver]

lol...Making friends this early I see!!

But of course! If people want another civil war I'll be happy to accommodate.

[cripplecreek]

She could have been caught in the act on camera and if the jury chose to acquit, that's the end of it.

THOMAS JEFFERSON (1789): I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.

JOHN ADAMS (1771): It's not only ....(the juror's) right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgement, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.

JOHN JAY (1794): The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.

ALEXANDER HAMILTON (1804): Jurors should acquit even against the judge's instruction...."if exercising their judgement with discretion and honesty they have a clear conviction that the charge of the court is wrong."

SAMUEL CHASE (1804): The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts.

OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES (1920): The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both the law and the facts.

[saminfl]

More pomposity. If the jury was wrong, those who saw all the evidence and disagreed had a right to insult the jury. Did you defend the OJ jury? Why is your opinion of the jury’s verdict the only correct opinion?

[Sacajaweau]

She’s gonna sue for something.....Or maybe they discovered she WAS a plant...

[driftdiver]

Imagine someone wanting to go home to their family after 6 weeks of being sequestered. the HORROR

[FrankR]

Drama Queen